Laserfiche WebLink
;. Inspection of existing building, or review of plans of existing building <br />with engineers to determine adequacy of existing plumbing, heating and <br />electrical portions of building for proposed expansion. <br />4. Submit the site development plans to City for review and discussion. <br />5. Modify site development plans in accordance with previous discussions. <br />Complete set of site development plans with complete budget estimate and <br />time schedule, would be submitted. <br />Attend meeting of Board. of Trustees to explain and discuss site develop- <br />ment plan and estimate with them. <br />City Manager stated he felt proposal made by this .firm a good one whether this <br />e..pansion plan for library was to be included in general City facilities expansion <br />program, or if on a_ different schedule because of acute shortage of space at this <br />facility. <br />If approved by Council at this time, agreement and recommendation would be brought <br />bac_, to Council at a later date ,­th recommendation for source of funds for the <br />study. Councilman Royer emphasized the need of this study now, and moved recommen- <br />dation of Library Board of Trustees and City Manager for acceptance of proposal <br />by architects Keller and Daseking be accepted, seconded by Councilman Granger and <br />c^.cried . (MINUTE ORDER `'66-38) <br />Councilman Granger stated he had requested status of Perry Street plan lines in vievf <br />of need for widening and improvement of this street. Slide shown of the plan lines <br />,,'hich Council advised were still in effect. Councilman Royer felt this recommenda- <br />tion should be referred to Staff for further _report on costs of improvements pro- <br />posed and possible financing report. Councilman Granger moved recommendation for Perry <br />Street improvements be referred to Staff for report on costs and recommendation for <br />possible financing, seconded by Councilman Royer and carried. (MINUTE CRDER ;66-3y) <br />Councilman Herkner, as Chairman of the Transportation Committee, reported on meetings <br />held with Peninsula Transit Lines and of their proposals concerning service and <br />equipment which were not considered satisfactory. He stated Committee had now agreed <br />on alternative proposal to transit company and outlined alternatives to be presented <br />in form of letter for which he asked Council's approval before sending. <br />Councilman Granger moved that the recommendation as set forth in the Transportation <br />Committee's communication be accepted. Councilman Royer asked that it be understood <br />this would grant authorization only for submission of letter to Peninsula Transit <br />Lines. Motion seconded by Councilman Royer and carried. (MINUTE ORDER #66-40) <br />Paul Tessendorff appeared to question status of his requests <br />concerning Claremont & El Camino. <br />Mayor Rosselli asked that this subject be on Agenda of February 21st for discussion. <br />(Memo 2/15/66) <br />Councilman Granger questioned SP parking lot condition and their unwillingness to par- <br />ticipate in correcting condition, and asked the City Manager be authorized to take <br />whatever steps were necessary to fill the hoes in this parking lot. City Attorney <br />questioned whether this lot was under lease or whether considered private property. <br />Mc-yor Rosselli asked this also be a. subject for discussion on the next Agenda, <br />February 21st . (Memo L j15 j'66 ) <br />