Minutes 1966 Jan to June - Laserfiche WebLink

Browse Search

recommends that fill operations be accomplished in conformity with the recommendations of the Seismic Report and that school districts develop sites in accordance with the Seismic recommendations. 10. BOUNDARY CHANGES; Redwood Shores will add pupils and assessed valuation to each school district in the area, but the additions will be disapro- portionate between districts under the existing boundary alignments. Belmont will receive a greater share of the pupils and a. less share of the assessed valuation. Unification of the area is an unresolved issue with some persons advocating one lirge unified district and others advocating a division. However, the unification issue is resolved, the Technical Committee recommends that all of Redwood Shores be placed in one school. district. 11. ICED TO CONTINUOUSLY RE-EVALUATE SCHOOL PI.,ANNING AND PROJECTIONS: Evidence of the need for continuous re-evaluation of projections is provided by the receipt of new schedules of assessed valuation estimates by the Technical Committee subsequent to the development of this Report. These new data have been incorporated in Chapter VI, but it is anticipated that many other changes will be forthcoming prior to the completion of the project. The Technical. Committee recommends that involved school districts devote atten- tion of evaluation of change and new data concerning the Redwood Shores Development on a. regular basis, at least four times each Near. Dr. James advised where copies of the report would be available in School District offices and City Manager advised .-There copies of the would be available in City offices and Library. City Manager stated another public clinic would be held on February 24th at the Veterans Memorial Building, called primarily at the request of the Planning Commission and to which other Board of the City would be invited. The public is Invited to attend. Jack Estes, "assistant County Assessor, appeared to state that the County "assessor's office is now fully automated; that they assess on 25% of the fair market value; that they project the value of the land on its potential just as proposed District Assessor would be required to do. Mrs. Mary '.':r. Henderson, 3093 Muller Court, questioned assessed valuation figure differences between those in Fesaibility Report and School .report and if figures were projected on the same basis. 1965-66 Mr. Kuebelbeck explained differences in figures used and method by which they were derived. He stated he applied a "deflating factor", which is typical for assessed valuation of property for school purposes taking into consideration that the tax base would be land, improvements and personal property. Mrs. Ingrid McFadden, Board Member, of League of vdonen Voters of South San Mateo County, read communication in which request by their organization was made for delaying acceptance of Feasi- bility Report until .further study was made by public, of the School Study. Mayor :?ossell.i. called a five minute recess at 10:30 P. M. Petition of H &. E Foods Corporation, El Camino and. Chestnut Street, for a. variance to the Sidewalk Ordinance (Sec. 29.25, et seq . of Municipal Code) to allow them to continue to use the existing planting strip (approximately 21 wide' along Lathrop and Chestnut Streets for planting after the completion of their new building, presented for Council's consideration. Staff reported need for this variance was briefly discussed as part of the proceedings relative to the parking situation for this restaurant and was recommended by Staff.