Minutes 1966 Jan to June - Laserfiche WebLink

Browse Search

"rontage, and the subdivisi..on. cf 1,ot 5, P,7 cl P, Pardini Subdivision, into three lots, presented for consideration. Planning Commission recommended exception be ranted as stated in report submitted to Council for review. c� ,. Councilman',^'eymouth moved to <tidopt RESOLUTTON N0. 4926GRANTING EXCEPTION TO PROVTSTONS OF CH'I.PT ,R ?0 OF THE CODE, OF THE CTTY OF RF:D`s,JOOD CITY, BEING THE SUBDIVISION REGULA- TIONS OF THE CITY OF R;,D,JOOD CITY, }1ND J'a PPROVTNG r SUBDIVISION THEREUNDF- H (P Irdini Subdivision) seconded b;T Councilman Granger and carried on roll call vote, Council- man Her.kner being noted absent. Applic tti.on of Lawrence G. Brian & Co. on behalf of Giovanni Romano for exception to the Subdivision Ordinance to subdivide into four Lots, Portion of Lot 9, Oakl%ood Parr:, property at 241 .past Oakwood Blvd. presented for consideration. Planning Commission recommended approval subject to condition that any nei^a electrical service installation be by underground conduit, and as reported in their recommen- dation submitted to Council previously. Councilman Granger moved to adopt RESOLUTION NO. 4927 GRANTING EXCEPTION TO PROVI- SIONS OF CHAPTER 30 OF THE CODE OF THE CITY OF RED,^JOOD CITY BEING THE SUBDTVTSION REGULATIONS OF THE CITY OF REDWOOD CTTY, AND r°:PPROVING A SUBDIVISION THF.RE.UND?R - ° ENCS G. BRTAN & CO. f^.ND GTOVANNT PLOM,1,,110, seconded by Councilman Weymouth and carried on roll call vote, Councilman Herl ner being noted absent. Counc_,lman Royer, as Counc_1 representative to the Bay -Front Committee, stated he would recommend Council's support of. Bay -Front Comm-11ttee Report which had taken many months of study from information submitted by some 19 different groups and wcu]-d indicate to County and citizens of Redwood City the stand of Council on this report, �,nci be an example to other communities fronting bay. He stressed fact Committee in complete concurrence with report as submitted, e:�'cept for the one minor exception ,11 he had previously noted at last Council meeting concerning his disagreement with phrase to `remove reference to a Bay -Front Freeway from existing maps", as he feat this should be shown as a "preliminary study" plan only. Councilman Royer also asked tiZ-.t an additional recommendation be included .,!hen Council's recommendation sent to County Regional Planning Commission and .which he stated was fairly covered in e.:pression submitted by the Committee for Greer_ Foothills: (#9 to be added to Council's recommendation to County Regional Planning Commission) "A Bay Front Freeway -is recognized as unnecessary and undesirable at this time, but when proven necessary should be constructed with a minimum of landfill, and a maximum of access (through trestles, bridges, tubes, etc.) to properly flush inner water, wildlife and recreational areas; and further, i.t shad never be proposed as deli.neatin�, outer limits to any bay filling operations". Councilman Royer asked communications received from Committee for Green Foothills and from a Citizens Group in Brisbane be acknowledged. City Clerk announced communications had been also received from the following: County Regional. Planning Committee advising if Council .-wishes to submit a statement on Bay -Front Committee report that it be referred to them by March ist.