Laserfiche WebLink
,ebsack replied this proceeding required 191 yct because of acquisition costs <br />exceedincr amount permissible under 1911 Acf-, and reviewed further restrictions as <br />to this being trust funds which could not be invested and only el,pended for specific <br />purpose of this improvement. Councilman Petersen expressed opinions justifying why <br />project should proceed and in best interests of Council to support it. <br />Councilman Weymouth moved to close the public hearing, seconded by Councilman Bury <br />and carried. <br />Councilman Herkner moved to adopt RFSOLUTTON NO. 49115 ORDERING MODIFICATION AND <br />ANr�',ND1)1ENT OF RESOLUTION OF' INTENTION NO. 11609, ALTAMONT-MIDFIELD-UTAH ?^dAY AND <br />VICINITY IMPROVEMENTS, seconded by Councilman_ Granger and carried unanimously on <br />roil call vote. <br />Councilman Royer moved to adopt RESOLUTION N0. 119116 DIRECTING TREASURER TO COLLECT <br />A.dD RrCFTVF ASS7SSNJFNTS, ALTA MONT-MTDFTELD-jTT^.N `:'^.Y AND VICTNTTY IMPROVEKIENTS, <br />secnnded by Councilman Granger and carried unanimously on ro11 call vote.. <br />Mayor Rosselli asked that discussion be resumed on Frac-nilly Acres W,) -ter System <br />recommendations. <br />Mrs. Schroeder, 1053 -10th !!venue as':ced whether pipe <br />lines oVined by City were rented by private industry. <br />,..a.ter Superintendent stated Friendly Acres ?dater Company does not pay a rent to <br />City for services operated off City's lines but were to maintain pipe lines in <br />good repair until City ta!�-es over. City Attorney stated rent should be paid to City <br />for use of these lines. He also described instances where lines installed by <br />subdivision agreements have contract with Friendly Acres Water Company by revocable <br />pe. -ml -t, for use for 111nited time, and which would be revoked when possible for City <br />to serve area. <br />City Attorney again reviewed recent State legislation prohibiting City from <br />pa-? l.el lin.; existing privately oi,:rued utility. <br />?]al.te.r. Harrington, 1057 -10th Avenue, questioned state- <br />ments made concerning conditions and whether this would <br />effect fire protection. <br />Councilman Weymouth felt it responsibility of City to protect citizens .and recom- <br />mended City check health and safety standards in this instance. Council questioned <br />improvements recommended for this phase and ultimate additional improvements needed <br />when system acquired by City. Water Superintendent stated these improvements would <br />mal -e for outstanding results to area. ?^later Surnerl_ntendent stated proposals des- <br />cribed for this phase viould equal 26�,-', of the total work required. Councilman <br />Granger wanted it noted City's interest in this problem not neva but of City's <br />inability previously to do anything because of lacy: of money and of present sales <br />tax moneys now making :at possible to consider improvements. <br />Mayor Rosselli reported on meetin; he and City Manager had held with Assemblyman <br />1?r.itschi in which it was indicated Redwood City stood well 3.n line for college <br />being considered here but of the all-out effort r.hich they had been informed would <br />have to be made, by shovaing a. total community support. <br />