Reso13 PC 13-16 2898 PC Reso Recommending Stanford EIR Certification

Browse Search

19. Use Iow�VOC (i.e., ROG) coatings �eyond the local req�airements (i.e., Regulation 8, Rule 3: Architectural Coatings). 20. All construction equipment, diesel trucks, and generators shall be equipped with Best Auailable Cor�trol Technology for emission reductions of NOx and PM. 21. Afl contractors shall use equipment tf�at meets ARB's most recent certificatio� standard for off-road heavy-duty diesel engines. �c} Proiect-Saecific Measures: 22. For construction, off-road equipment sf�all be Tier 4 or shafl achieve Tier 4 particulate matter emission le�eFs thraugh use of one or more of the follflwing: Tier 21Tier 3 equipment with diesei {�articulate filfers; alterna#i�e fuels (e.g. biadiesel or liquefred natural gas); andlor electrification. 23. F'or each phase of project construc#ion, the applicant shall maintai� ROG emission below 54 pounds per day. The applicant may demonstrate compliance with tt�is limit through one or mare of the follawing: strategic project phasing, use of pre-coated building ma#erials, andlor use of low-VOC coatings beyond the requirements of BAAQMD Regulation 8, Rule 3. Finding: Implementation af Mitigation S-1 would reduce project construction-related air quality impacts due to localized PM,o and ROG emissions to a less-thar►- significant level. However, though the NOx emissions from construction of the project would be reduced by up to 20 peroent, there is a potential that cons#ruction period NOx emissions could still exceed the BAAQMD threshold e�en with the mitigation measure, and as a result, the potential impack from NOx is considered signifrcant and unavoidable. Facts in Support of �inding; The identified grading, demolition, and construction mitigation measures are recommended by BAAQMD or are based on the BAAQMD CEQA Guidelines. They are effective methods for reducing equipment exhaust emissions and fugitive dust to the maximum extent feasible. However, due to t�e extent of on-site construction at any one time, t�ere is a potential that construction period NOx emissions oould still exceed the B�QMD threshold e�en with ►r�itiga#ion, and as a result, the potential impact from NOx is considered significant and una�oidable. T#�ese facts are described and quantified in Draft �IR chapter 8 (Air Quality) on pages 8-1 through 8-28, Draft �IR a�pendix 21.�4 (Supplemental Air Quality and Cfimate Change Informatian), and Final EiR appendix B (5upplemental Bay Area Air Quality Management District [BAAQMD] Information}, which are hereby incorporated by reference. Impact: Impact 8-2: Operatior�al Emissions Increases. Proje� de�elopment would genera#e stationary, area, and traffic air pollutant emissions increases. These emissions would not su#�ject sensitive receptors to substantial pal��tant concentratians, but emissions of ROG and PM10 would exceed BAAQMD sign�ficance thresholds. A�'T'YIRESD.2898/PC RESO RECOMMENDIfdG 57ANFORD EIR CERTIFICATION REV;OS-15-13 V!i Page 11 of 56