Reso13 PC 13-16 2898 PC Reso Recommending Stanford EIR Certification

Browse Search

Finding: Implementation vf Mitigation 7-20 would reduce the project's impact on pedestrRan facilities to a less-than-signi�icantlevel. Facts in Support of Finding: Implementation af Mitigation 7-20 would reduce the project's impact on pedestrian facilities to a less-than-significant le�el by adding high visibility crosswalks alor�g Bay Road that are aligned with the intersecting streets. These facts are described ir� Draft �IR chapter 7 (Transportation, Circulation, and Parking) on pages 7-1 through 7-7'Q, Draft �IR appendix 21.3 (Supplemental Transportation Informa#ion}, and Final EIR appendix A (Supplemental Tra�c Information), which are hereby incorporated by reference. Utilities Impact: Impact 70-7: Need for Emergency Potable Water Storage. P�oject de�elopment would require smergency potable water starage per City requirements. The infrastructure (e.g., water tank and distribution system) necessary to meet this requirem�nt has not be�n incorporated as a companent of the proposed �roject. Mitigation: Mitigation 'l0-9. Based on the projected emergency potable water storage requirement for the proposed project, #�e project applicant shall contribute the funds equi�alent ta the cost of providing 490 equivalent dwelling units (EDU) {$1.5 millian in 2011 dollars) of emergency potable water storage tawards the design and construction of the planned off-site areawide storage#acility. Finding: lmplementation of Mitigation 10-1 would reduce the praject impact on emergency potable water storage to a less-fhan-significanf Ievel. Facts in Support of Finding: Implementation of Mitigation 'f 0-1 would reduce the project impact on emergency potable water storage to a less-than-significant le�el through the appiicant's contribution of approximately$1.5 rnillion (in 2011 dollars} taward the City's piannsd off-site areawide storage facilify. These facts are describ�d in Drait EIR chapter 1Q (Utilities), section 10.1 {Water}, an �ages 10-1 through 10-15, and appendix 21.5 {Supplementai Public Utilities Information), which are hereby incorporated by reference. rmpact: Impact 10-2: Increased Peak Wastewater Flows in the Local FOSM� Collection System. It is estimated that the proposed project development site's peak wastewater flows to the F05MD sewer system would be approximately 4.5 times the flow under existing (full occupancy} conditions, from 112 gallons per minute (gpm) ta fi27 gpm. Based on informatian pro�ided �y #he County Department of Public Works, it has not yet been confirmed whether the two existing sewer lines that would carry this increased wastewater flow acrvss the freeway have sufficient capacity to accommodate such an increase. Mitigation: Mi#igatian 10-2. At th� time that construction of net new square footage on th� project de�elopment site is proposed, the applicant's enginee� shall work with F�SMD and the San Mateo County Engineering Department to verify that the local �OSMD sewer netwar�C, particularly lines 100 and 200, has adequate ATTY/RE50.2898/PC RESd RECOMMEN�ING STANFORD EIR CERTIFICA7IQN REV:08-15-13 VR Page 43 of 56