My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Browse
Search
AgdaPkt 2013-08-26
RedwoodCity
>
City Clerk
>
Agenda Packets
>
2010-2019
>
2013
>
AgdaPkt 2013-08-26
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/23/2015 5:10:00 PM
Creation date
8/22/2013 4:35:34 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CC Index
CC Index - Document Type
Agenda Packet
Meeting Type
Joint
Agency Type
City Council and Successor Agency and Public Financing Authority
Date
8/26/2013
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
143
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
6.1.C. - Page 9 <br /> • Opportunities for branding and "themeing" <br /> In addition, consultant will create an e�aluation matrix based on agreed-upfln project <br /> abjectives that will be �sed to guide, compare, and rank alternati�e plans as they are <br /> de�eloped. The project objectives will have been vetted with the Task Force in Task 2.7 <br /> and detarmined by City staff.} Evafuation criteria may include items such as: <br /> ■ Ability to fund improvements <br /> ■ Ease of financing <br /> ■ Ease of construction <br /> ■ Buildable in phases <br /> ■ Affordable construction as well as maintenance <br /> ■ Impacts to local community, traffic, and infrastructure <br /> • Canformance to key principles of VisFOn Plan and General Plan <br /> ■ Ease of environmental clearance <br /> ■ Sustainable and eco-friendly and Bay-friendly impra�ements <br /> ■ Hous�rtg goals <br /> 4.2 De�elop Preliminary Alterna#ives <br /> Consultant wil! develop up to fi�e afternative plans for the project area that demonstrate <br /> distinct differe�ces in achieving the majority of the plan objectives. For example, while <br /> one plan may focus on maximizing development through increased densities, another <br /> plan may focus more on a greater emphasis on resource areas and recreation. A <br /> memorandum comparing the alternates will be prepa�ed using the e�aluation matrix <br /> created in Task 4.1 <br /> 4.3 Review A[ternati�es with City staff <br /> Consul#ant will meet with City staff ta confirm the preliminary alternates and evaluation <br /> matrix priar to meeting with tt�e Task Force. �ne final round of refnements to the <br /> alternatives and evaluation matrix may be required prior to meeting with the Task Force. <br /> 4.4 Task Force Meeting 5 — Preliminary Alternatives <br /> Agenda: Re�iewldiscuss alt�rnati�es with the intent of eliminating two entire alternatives <br /> ar synthesizing the fi�e preliminary alternati�es into three aiternatives. <br /> 4.5 Determine Alternatives with Pros and Cons <br /> Following Task Force Meeting 5, cor�sultar�t will refine the al#ernatives to create th� <br /> three alternati�es for prese�tation to the community in an Alternat�ves Workshop. This <br /> includes preparation of#Y�ree colored plans and the evaluation matrix. Plans will be <br /> produced full-size for the meeting as we�l as incl�ded in a PowerPoint �resentation. <br /> ATTY/AGR/2013.123/MIG Inner HarborAmendment No.1 <br /> REV:07-24-13 VR <br /> Page 6 of 13 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.