Laserfiche WebLink
be commingled with comments pertaining to the IHSP analysis. This scope assumes a <br /> reasonable level of effort to prepare responses to comments unique to the Harbor View <br /> Place project. ESA also assumes some discrete additional effort to address an MMRP for <br /> the project, assuming any mitigation measures are identified. <br /> 2. Technical Tasks and Assumptions <br /> Table E-1 below describes the project-level technical analysis to be conducted for each <br /> environmental topic in the EIR. <br /> Table E-1 -Project-level Technical Tasks <br /> � _ _ _ <br /> ��'�-� �� � � <br /> - � T rE _ ���«������ �. _ <br /> 5.1 Ae�thetics� �� � � � <br /> Context: To assess whether the Project would have project-level ;Assumptions: <br /> The Project would alter the visual ` �mpacts or contribute to any cumulative impact,ESA will: <br /> character the IH-2 area of the Specific � � • No additional scenic view <br /> Plan Area(plan area).It would also ' • Assess the Project compared to IHSP policies regarding �R�dors or other visual <br /> potentially alter views of and through height,bulk,and visual qualiiy,as well as design guidelines resources will be considered <br /> portions of the plan area and change and parameters for future development,that are intended to ; �an those confirmed by the <br /> nighttime lighting and glare conditions, ; address aesthetic characteristics of the IHSP area. � City for the IHSP EIR <br /> as would have been evaluated at a assessment. <br /> program level in the IHSP EIR. • Review detailed information,illustrations and plans of the { , No project-level <br /> Project and,using objective descriptive categories,discuss <br /> The IHSP EIR would have identified whether the Project would substantially degrade or obstruct photographic visual <br /> scenic view comdors and resources publicly-accessible scenic views or substantially degrade simulations will be prepared <br /> and assessed program-level effects the existing visual character or quality of the area. ; by ESA or MIG. <br /> from up to five(5)public v�wpoints of � � q�ess potential change in nighttime lighting and glare <br /> bulk visual simulations of the IHSP effects. <br /> preferred scenario(prepared by MIG). <br /> Program level effects and mitigation <br /> measures would have been identified. ' <br /> REV:06-15-15 VR <br /> Page 9 of 18 <br /> ATTY/AGR.Amend No. 2lESA Inner Harbor EIR Amendment No. 2 <br />