Laserfiche WebLink
� a:� � � � ., " �� <br /> 3 . � �, , i, �� ��,�3�3��� <br /> �...,�.,t�>. ,. ��,€€€g..._k;��� . � �...i �,�.'�E'�....w..,,��� � �f�..... � ! � r�.'.. J `�. ,.� � ...��...��� <br /> �..... ..:�....�,a „» . .... . .w .... � <br /> ' the site <br /> - Transit access adjacent to the site � <br /> - Pedestrian access to and from transit stops � <br /> - Parking supply in comparison to City Code <br /> requirements and ITE parking demand <br /> I Transportation Demand Manaqement fTDM1 Proqram � <br /> Analysis <br /> • Review the project sponsor's proposed TDM Program for <br /> conformance to GCAG Guidelines and recommend <br /> changes,if necessary.(Projects generating more than 100 <br /> peak hour vehicle tnps are subject to TDM requirements set j <br /> : forth by the San Mateo CICAG.) <br /> ', • Quantify the trip reductions and benefits from the TDM <br /> ' measures using the TDM+tool.Recommended strategies � <br /> , and findings of this task will be documented and can be used � <br /> as a programmatic mitigation measure,if needed. � <br /> E <br /> ' Documentation � <br /> ! • The analysis will be submitted as the transportationitraific � <br /> sec�ion of the Administrative Draft and one(1)Screencheck � <br /> Draft of EIR. <br /> • Appendices will include traffic counts,level of service � <br /> ' calculations,a list of approved development,assumptions [ <br /> '; regarding planned developments,plus other relevant � <br /> information ' <br /> 5.15 Utilities and Service Systems <br /> Context: To assess whether the Project would have project-level ' <br /> The IHSP EIR would have desaibed ' �mpacts or contribute to any cumulative impact,ESA wilL � <br /> the IHSP utilities and service systems ! . Desaibe existing inftastructure conditions and discuss , <br /> setting that would also apply to the potential impacts of the Project on the following utilities and � <br /> Project,specifically information �Nice systems,to the extent the Pro ect demand exceeds <br /> regarding existing infrastructure,flows, that assumed for the IH-2 area of the�HSP: � <br /> and capacities(for sewer,water and I <br /> recycled water,stormwater drainage, - wastewater flow and treatment(sanitary sewer) <br /> solid waste and energy),and the po�ble water supply capacity(based on an <br /> potential effect of development under ' amended water supply assessment from the local ? <br /> the Specific Plan on those utilities and '' water service provider,Redwood City)and the <br /> service capacities.This information ' potential for recycled water to be used, [ <br /> would be based largely on work ' <br /> previously prepared by Fuscce ' - stormwater drainage systems ` <br /> Engineering for the IHSP and IHSP ; <br /> EIR. - energy,and <br /> Fuscoe Engineering,on behalf of the - solid waste processing. � <br /> City,would have requested and ' . As appropriate, identify project-level mitigation measures to <br /> obtained a water supply assessment of '' address utilities and service systems effects,based on any <br /> development under the IHSP. program-level mitigation measures identified in IHSP EIR. � <br /> I <br /> _.._.._ - - - __._.___ _..-'___ ___v _....._� _....__.....__ __ �..---_. _..�� <br /> REV:06-15-15 VR <br /> Page 16 of 18 <br /> ATTY/AGR.Amend No. 2/ESA Inner Harbor EIR Amendment No. 2 <br />