Laserfiche WebLink
EXHIBIT D 09/09/2013 <br /> MONITORING VERIFICATION <br /> IDENTIFIED IMPACT RELATED MITIGATION MEASURE Implementation Monitoring and Timing Signature Date <br /> Pe1'fOrmanCe Crlterla Entity Verification Entity Requirements <br /> level. If it is determined that the Woodside <br /> Road improvements remain infeasible <br /> because the improvements are not <br /> consistent with the New Redwood City <br /> General Plan and/or Caltrans policy,the <br /> cumulative impact would remain <br /> signii►cant and unavoidable,as would the <br /> proposed projecYs contribution to that <br /> cumulative im act. <br /> Impact 7-15: Cumulative With Project Mitigation 7-15. To mitigate the significant Applicant fair share or City Prior to building <br /> Impact on Douglas Avenue/Bay Road cumulative impact at the intersection of payment of Traffic permit issuance that <br /> Intersection. Under Cumulative With Project Douglas Avenue and Bay Road,the Impact Fee would result in <br /> conditions during the PM peak hour,the intersection would need to be signalized 759,845 total square <br /> intersection would degrade from LOS C to with protected phasing on the eastbound feet in Precise Plan <br /> LOS F,and the proposed project could and westbound approaches on Bay Road. Blocks A-E. Refer to <br /> contribute up to 78.2 seconds of critical delay In addition to signalization, both the Stanford Precise <br /> to the intersection. According to City of eastbound and westbound approaches Plan, Chapter IV, <br /> Redwood City guidelines,this constitutes a would need to be restriped to include a Intersection <br /> cumulatively considerable contribution to total of one left-turn lane and one shared Improvements Table. <br /> a signii►cant cumulative impact. through/right-turn lane on both the <br /> eastbound and westbound approaches. <br /> With these improvements the level of <br /> service(LOS)at this intersection would <br /> improve to an acceptable LOS C during the <br /> PM peak hour. <br /> Traffic from the proposed project could add <br /> up to 78.2 seconds to the PM peak hour <br /> delay at this intersection over Cumulative <br /> No Project conditions(see EIR Table 7.16); <br /> other Cumulative growth could add up to <br /> 11.9 seconds to the delay over Near Term <br /> No Project conditions. The proposed <br /> project would contribute its fair share to a <br /> mitigation fund established to pay for the <br /> cost of this improvement(estimated,based <br /> on this EIR,to be 87 percent)at the time of <br /> issuance of a building permit or,if the City <br /> adds the improvement to its Traffic Impact <br /> Fee Program(TIF)project list,the <br /> proposed project would pay its Traffic <br /> Impact Fee in effect at time of payment and <br /> issuance of a building permit. <br /> The proposed projecYs payment of its fair <br /> share toward these improvements would <br /> mitigate the projecYs contribution to the <br /> Page 12 �2 r 1106721FElRIMMRP Checklist(10672J.doc <br /> RESO. 15294 <br /> MUFF#100 <br />