Res13 15294 - Laserfiche WebLink

Browse Search

EXHIBIT D 09/09/2013 MONITORING VERIFICATION IDENTIFIED IMPACT RELATED MITIGATION MEASURE Implementation Monitoring and Timing Signature Date Pe1'fOrmanCe Crlterla Entity Verification Entity Requirements contribution to a signii►cant cumulative Traffic from the proposed project could add Intersection impact. up to 6.7 seconds to the AM peak hour Improvements Table. delay at this intersection over Cumulative No Project conditions(see EIR Table 7.16); other Cumulative growth could add up to 89.8 seconds to the delay over Near Term No Project conditions. The proposed project would contribute its fair share to a mitigation fund established to pay for the cost of this improvement(estimated,based on this EIR,to be 7 percent)at the time of issuance of a building permit or,if the City adds the improvement to its Traffic Impact Fee Program(TIF)project list,the proposed project would pay its Traffic Impact Fee in effect at time of payment and issuance of a building permit. The proposed projecYs payment of its fair share toward these improvements would mitigate the projecYs contribution to the cumulative impact to a less-than- si nii►cant level. Impact 7-18: Cumulative With Project Mitigation 7-18. To mitigate the Applicant fair share or City; Menlo Park Prior to building Impact on Marsh Road/Scott Drive cumulative impact at the intersection of payment of Traffic permit issuance that Intersection. Under Cumulative With Project Marsh Road and Scott Drive,the Impact Fee would result in conditions during the PM peak hour,the eastbound approach of Scott Drive would 893,810 total square intersection,would remain at LOS F and the need to be restriped to include a total of feet in Precise Plan proposed project could contribute up to 14.4 one shared through/left-turn lane and one Blocks A-E. Refer to seconds of delay. The intersection of Marsh right-turn lane. (Marsh Road is considered Stanford Precise Road/Scott Drive is located in the City of north-south and Scott Drive is considered Plan, Chapter IV, Menlo Park. According to City of Menlo Park east-west.) With these improvements,the Intersection guidelines,this constitutes a cumulatively level of service(LOS)at this intersection Improvements Table. considerable contribution to a signii►cant would remain an unacceptable LOS F cumulative impact. during the PM peak hour. Although the LOS F still exceeds the City of Menlo Park LOS standard,the LOS under Cumulative With Project conditions would be better than that under Cumulative No Project conditions. Traffic from the proposed project could contribute up to 14.4 seconds to the PM delay at this intersection over Cumulative No Project conditions(see EIR Table 7.16); other Cumulative growth could add up to 74.4 seconds to the delay over Near Term No Pro�ect conditions. The ro osed Page 14 �4 r 1106721FElRIMMRP Checklist(10672J.doc RESO. 15294 MUFF#100