Res13 15294 - Laserfiche WebLink

Browse Search

EXHIBIT D 09/09/2013 MONITORING VERIFICATION IDENTIFIED IMPACT RELATED MITIGATION MEASURE Implementation Monitoring and Timing Signature Date Pe1'fOrmanCe Crlterla Entity Verification Entity Requirements operation at the time of construction of the child care center,and if the detailed analysis described above shows PMZ.S levels exceeding the 0.3�ag/m3 standard throughout the development site,construction and operation of a child care center on the development site shall be prohibited. If the detailed analysis shows that some or all of the development site would be exposed to PMZ.S levels lower than 0.3�ag/m3,the outdoor use area for the child care center shall be sited in one of those locations. Implementation of these measures would reduce this impact to a less-than- si nii►cant level. CLIMATE CHANGE Impact 9-1: Sea Level Rise Impacts on Mitigation 9-1. For all new development Applicant City Prior to grading Project Development. Based on the BCDC on the project development site,the City permit issuance; sea level rise maps,the project may be shall ensure that the development complies prior to building affected by anticipated sea level rise and with the most current Redwood City permit issuance;field associated changes in broader flood plain General Plan and Redwood City Municipal verify implementation boundaries. Potential impacts associated Code requirements for protection from during grading and with future development that may be subject flood hazards,consistent with Mitigation construction to sea level rise include risk to public safety 10-3 in chapter 10(Utilities),of this EIR. and property damage,representing a These provisions would require compliance potentiallysignii►cant impact. with associated storm drainage storage, building elevation,and flood-proofing requirements. Implementation of these measures would be expected to reduce this im act to a less-than-si nii►cant level. UTILITIES Impact 10-1: Need for Emergency Potable Mitigation 10-1. Based on the projected Applicant fair share City Prior to building Water Storage. Project development would emergency potable water storage permit issuance for require emergency potable water storage per requirement for the proposed project,the net new City requirements. Because the project applicant shall contribute the funds development,to be infrastructure(e.g.,water tank and equivalent to the cost of providing 490 implemented distribution system)necessary to meet this equivalent dwelling units(EDU)($1.5 proportionately as requirement has not been incorporated as a million in 2011 dollars)of emergency net new development component of the proposed project,the need potable water storage towards the design occurs. Refer to for emergency potable water storage and construction of the planned off-site Stanford Precise represents a potentiallysignii►cant project areawide storage facility. Implementation Plan, Chapter III, im act. of this measure would reduce the identified Phasing/ Page 22 22 r 1106721FElRIMMRP Checklist(10672J.doc RESO. 15294 MUFF#100