Laserfiche WebLink
8.A. - Page 119 <br />and the Scotts' lot is approximately 43%. There <br />��t Is approximately 3T%, ane of them lyes a slope <br />are eleven ownerships of undeveloped land and oalYeand economics, it <br />of less than 305. In the interests of health* so y, <br />would appear that these hada should not be develaped at all. If they are <br />allowed to be developed minimallyo this should not occur motss thhs a <br />reorganization, consolidation, and reallocation of haldisgaor cluster <br />development, where development is possible. The severest terrains Whom <br />development is not possible, should then he used as common open <br />conclusion <br />. There is ao Simple, satisfactory answer yet discovered to allow the <br />build -out of :.aural Way. Each individual developme-t that has occurred <br />has been in a s -lightly more precarious Situation w;th respect to health, <br />safety, and economics. Additional developments mould, in tura, be <br />increasingly more precarious. There are a = ber of courses of action <br />that the City car, take with respect to Laurel iay at this Lime' <br />1. Cacaider the Georges' property as the end of the line, <br />reserving the balance of the undeveloped area for some <br />innovative approach of land assembly and reallocation, with <br />a planned development permit, or a redevelopment project, <br />growing out of the joint efforts of the owners. <br />2. Allow a substandard turnaround to be built to serve the <br />Hatfields' property as the last extension, reserving the <br />balance for some other solution. <br />3. Allow a substandard turnaround to be built to serve both <br />the Hatfields' and the Scotts' prapertiea, as the last <br />extension, reservissg the balance for same other solution. <br />RECOVeENDMON <br />While development of the Hatfields' and Scotts' properties is <br />physically possible, allowing their, development will likely increase the <br />City's liabilities with respect to possible future slope failures and will <br />certainly diminish the feasibility of arriving at a satisfactory solation <br />for the development of the balance of Laurel Way. Tberef ore, it is <br />recommended that the course Of action, listed a' numbeone-above the ead of <br />adopted by the City, viz., consider the Georges property <br />the line, reserving the balance of the Undeveloped area for some <br />innovative approach of land assembly and realiocatm, wth a planned <br />joint <br />development permit, or a redevelopment project, growing cut ofthe <br />.ftnrr_s of the owners. <br />cc.,4, �7� <br />Community DivelopmenL Director <br />