Laserfiche WebLink
8.A. - Page 351 <br />(flAftiga+tlan flltsres ure 0 folog0, wwerpt): <br />"If active nests (Le nests In with eggs or young present) are found <br />within 300 filet of the project **Vdnt for raptor (birds of prey) species or 100 feet <br />of the project fbotprtnt for all other bird species, non-dlslurbsnce buffy m shall be <br />esf fished at a distance suf iident to minimize disturbance, based on ft nest <br />location, tgpography, amr, the species' tolerance to clMmbanoe and the <br />typeklursdon of potential disturbance. Work wflhln non{ilaiurbarioa buffers shall <br />be rescheduled to occur after the young have fledged as determined by a <br />qualified blologlsto <br />(MIUUW*n Messure 6iokey-2, cxaorpt) <br />ONauitable roosting habitat is Identified, the following measures shall be <br />conducted. A qualified biologist sha0 survey suitable roost sites immediately prior <br />to the removal or grading of rock oul croppingsr, debris plies, manmade <br />structures, etc. Removal of suitable tree roost sites shall be conducted by first <br />removing limbs smaller then 3 inches In diameter and posting away loose bark. <br />The bee shall then be telt ovemight to allow any bats using the tree/snag to find <br />another most during thsdr noctumal sracWhy Wad. A qualified biologist shall <br />survey the treWanags a second time the following morning prior to feilfng and removal.' <br />Page 2 of <br />8.A. - Page 109 <br />Overall, I em skeptical about the full enfam6abiilty of such an ambitious MMRP. I expressed similar <br />opinions during the public hearing held on December 7, 2010 by the Pll=nning Commission. <br />Thanks for your kind consideration of this fetter, <br />David Rodriguez -Gomez <br />$11612011 <br />