Laserfiche WebLink
8.B. - Page 212 <br /> Chair Borgens noted a period when some nearby cities had too many businesses of one <br /> kind and made a mandate to have retail in order to prevent that. She noted her concern <br /> about the lack of response from businesses on the item tonight. She stated the City has <br /> done well on hiring Staff to get the word out but she needed to hear more from property <br /> owners. <br /> Vice Chair Schmidt noted that the Redwood City website has a list of vacancies and <br /> what they cost. <br /> Commissioner Radcliffe noted she sits on the board for the Downtown Business Group <br /> and that this issue has not been brought to them. <br /> Commissioner White asked the public speakers to come back to the night this item is <br /> moved to. <br /> Chair Borgens stated that all of the amendments except for the ground-floor office <br /> proposal can be acted on this evening. <br /> Mr. Zack stated there were some comments about the other parts of the amendment, <br /> too and that he can make the requested modifications and brings it all back at once, as <br /> well as the additional information that was requested about the ground-floor office <br /> proposal. <br /> MOTION TO CONTINUE THE ITEM IN ITS ENTIRETY TO THE NEXT SCHEDULED <br /> MEETING: <br /> M/S: White/Radcliffe <br /> Motion Passed: All Yes. <br /> 5.B INITIAL STUDY/ MIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION, PLANNED <br /> DEVELOPMENT PERMIT, EXCEPTIONS TO THE SUBDIVISION ORDINANCE <br /> AND VESTING TENTATIVE MAP FOR THE 1410 VALOTA ROAD <br /> RESIDENTIAL PROJECT <br /> Mr. Lyon introduced the item. <br /> Mrs. Littlefield made some clarifications to the Staff report: On page 28, under "Summary <br /> of City Review Process," the applicant name should be replaced with "1410 Vallota Road <br /> Partners, LLC" not the Chamberlain Group. The bottom of page 28 indicates the original <br /> canceled date of the meeting and should be replaced with April 3rd. On Page 29 "Arial" <br /> should be replaced with "Aerial." On Page 34, item no. 2b, "Lots 2 through 4" should be <br /> replaced with "Lots 2 through 5" which references the proposed panhandle configuration <br /> for these lots. This correction should also be reflected in the resolutions. On Page 51, <br /> the third and fourth "whereas" should replace "March 6t"" with "April 3rd, 2012" as well as <br /> the other resolution on Page 60. On Page 54 and Page 64, condition number 7 states <br /> there are two sections, but 8 and 9 should be subsections "a" and "b." <br /> Mrs. Ramirez noted Page 40, the Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration resolution, <br /> the second to last "whereas" has a March 6 that needs to change to April 3. <br /> Mrs. Littlefield gave the following presentation: <br /> Page 8 of 16 <br />