Laserfiche WebLink
_ 2 Envir�rarnental�naly�is <br /> with the effects of past projects, the effects of <br /> other current projects, and the effects of <br /> probable future pxojects}? <br /> c) Does the project have environmentai effects ❑ � ❑ � <br /> which will cause substantiai adverse effects on <br /> human beings, either directly or indirecdp? <br /> a1 Daes the project have the potentral to degtade the guality ofthe enviror�me�t, <br /> substantra]lyreduce th�habitat ofa frsh or wrldlrfe specles, cause a fish or wildlife <br /> papulatiorl ta dtop below self-sustainirig Ievels, thteaterl ta elrmrriate a plat�t or animal <br /> C�Y?Illl[71111y,reduce the riumbet or restrict the range ofa rare ot erldangered pla�t or animal <br /> or elrrr�tnate importarit examples ofthe majarperiads ofCalifornra�iistory orprehistory? <br /> As nated in the discussions for Biological Resources, Hpdrology and Water Quality,and Cultural <br /> Resources, sensit�ve resources are potentiallp located in the project area. Implementation of <br /> proposed mitigarion would reduce impacts to the sensitive resources to less-than-significant levels. <br /> The project would not degrade the environment,substanria�ly reduce the habitat fox rare and <br /> endangered species, cause a fish or wildlife popuIation to drop below self-sustaining levels,threaten <br /> to elizninate a plant or animal comrr�unity,reduce the number or restrict the range of a rare or <br /> endangered plant ox anirnal, or eliminate important examples of the major periods of California <br /> history or prehistory. (Less than Significant Impact with Mitigation Incorporarion) <br /> b)D�es the project have rnipacts that are irldividually lrmrted, but cumulatrvely <br /> corrsiderahle?("Cumulatrvely corrsiderable"mear�s that the r�cremental effects a�'a pxoject <br /> ate considetable when vrewed in connectiar� svith the effects afpast prajects, the effects af <br /> othet currentprojects, and the effects ofprobable fvtvre projects)� <br /> The project wouJ.d not contribute considerably to significant cumulative impacts. The p�oposed <br /> project would cammence construct�an for the new putnp stauon and wet well in January 2014 at a <br /> time when construction at the One I�Zarina development would still be underway. Most project <br /> impacts would be site-specific and would not combine with the impacts from adjacent activities. The <br /> parking and staging areas for the proposed pxoject would be on site and wou�d not block the <br /> roadway,and the combinec� traffic on East Bayshore Road and Bair Island Road would not be <br /> signi�icant. Construction on the City-owned parcel would also occur during ongoing construction <br /> f�om the Noxth Main Street Precise Plan,but the combined impacts would not cause signi�icant <br /> parking or traffic impacts on Main Street and Brewster Avenue. The propased improvements on the <br /> Citp-owned parcel would require few workers and deliveries and would nat resu�.t in significant delays <br /> to e�sting and planned traffic in the atea. The air quality and noise impacts of the inc�ividual project <br /> would be mitigated ta less than significant levels. The combined impacts from conc�rrent <br /> construction acti`rities would not be significant. {Less than Significant) <br /> 2-6$ US 901 Pedestrian Undercrossi�rg and Baar <br /> 1`slnnd Aoad Storm I3raan Pump Statiora Project <br />