Laserfiche WebLink
2 En�irorarnental Analysir <br /> the 18 percent reducrion allowable for the One Maxina current locari�n to the existing condition, <br /> even through residents are nat likely to walk ar bike to Downtown«7thout the proposed path. <br /> Based on the CaIEEMOD mode�ing,the joint use path would result in reductions that would <br /> offset the emissions of criteria pallutants from other project operario�s and result in a net <br /> xeducrion in emissions of ozone precursors and patticulates in the air basin,except for NO,. <br /> The net increase in NOx would still be more than 100 titnes below tlle average daily and annual <br /> si�nificance levels (see Appendix C�. <br /> a) Co�f7rct wrth ar obstruct implementation of the applicable air guality pla,�? <br /> The proposed project would nat conflict with or obstruct implementarion of the BA.AQI�TI] 2010 <br /> CAP. The proposed Caterpillar 250-kW Tier 3 emergency generator, the only new stasionary source <br /> associated with the project,�rould meet the BAAQMD requirement fox Best Available Control <br /> Technalogy (BAC'T). The construcrion contractors would use equipment certifred to EPA <br /> requi�ements and would have to comply with the CARB regula�ions for off-road engines and <br /> equipment. Construcrion and operation of the pxoject would comply with a11 applicable BAr�QMD <br /> regulations. The project would also be consistent with applicable Redwood City General Plan <br /> policies regarding reducrion of vehicle emissions,mirigation of significant impacts,potential to <br /> generate hazardous ai.x pollutants,and review of projects for consistency with other agencies. {No <br /> Impact) <br /> b) Vialate any air guality standard or corltttbute substantially to ar1 existing or projected arr <br /> quality violation? <br /> The proposed pro�ect would not violate an�air quality standard o�contribute substantially to an <br /> exisring or pxojected air quality violation. The emissions of particulates and ozone precursors (ROG <br /> and NO� during constxucrion wou�d contribute to existing non-attaininent levels of PM�t,,PM2,;,and <br /> ozone, but the contribution would not be substanrial. Average daily emissions from the proposed <br /> construction activities would be less than the B�lAQMD significance levels,and the City has <br /> incorparated the basic construction measures to reduce fugitive d�st that the BAr'�QMD <br /> recommends for all proposed projects as a mitigation measu�e,which includes Best Management <br /> I'racrices for fugirive dust. The combined operaiional emission from the propased joint-use path and <br /> pump station wotald result in a net reduction in emissions of critetia poIlutants. <br /> The following mitigation measures would reduce fugitive dust and emissians from cons�ruction <br /> equipment from the proposed project: <br /> Mitigation Measure AIR 1: Basic Construction Mitigation Measures <br /> The Citp shall have the Contractor implement the foIlowing measures to xeduce dust and <br /> exhaust emissions fram construction activities: <br /> 2-11 US 109 Pe�e.rtrian Undercyos.ring and Bair <br /> IslAnd Aoad Sta��'Draisa Pump Statron Project <br />