Laserfiche WebLink
2 Envi��ramental Analysis <br /> d)Be located an a site which rs iricluded or�a list ofhazardous materials sites compiled <br /> pursuarlt to Governmerrt Code Section 65962.5 arid, as a result, would it create a srgniftcant <br /> hazard to the pu,�ilic or the envixar�rxient? <br /> The project axea does not contain anp sites that are on the Iist of Hazardous Waste and Substance <br /> Site maintained bp the DTSC,pursuant to Government Code Section 65962.5 (DTSC,2102}. Based <br /> on the hazarc�ous materia�.datahase searches and ESA {See Appendix F�, one facili��adjacent to the <br /> project area,at 350 Convention Wap,was reported to have LUSTs;the facility site-clean up has been <br /> completed, and the State Water Resources Control Board (SWRCB) c].osed the case as of February 6, <br /> 2001 (SWRCB,2013}. The proposed project wauld not involve any activiues on the parcels <br /> identified as hazardous material-fisted sites. No federal National Priori.ty-listed (NPL} sites are <br /> within a 3.0-mile radius of the project area. One acri�e Compxehensive Environmental Response, <br /> Compensation,and Liability Inforn�arion System{CERCLIS) site (Duolite Interna�ional} is <br /> app�oximately one mil.e southeast of the project area. Th�ee Resaurce Conservation and Reco�Tery <br /> Act(RCRA) hazardous waste sites are within a 3.0-mile xadius of the project area;the closest is 1.3 <br /> miles to the northeast. At these distances,the materials at these sites woul.d not affect the proposed <br /> consttuction aclivities. {No Impact) <br /> f)For a project withiti the vicinrty ofa ptivate airstrip, would the project result in a safety <br /> hazard for peaple resrdtng or working i� the ptaject area? <br /> The proposed project would be appro�mately 1.5 miles from the San CarZos Airpo�t and would be <br /> consistent witl�the areas of influence established by the City and County Associat�on of <br /> Governments o�San Mateo County (C/CAG). The ground-level facilities would not result in a <br /> hazatd to navigable airspace at the airport,according to the crite�ria in the Federal Aviation <br /> Regulations (FAR) Part 77, 06jectsAffectin�NavigaGleAir.+�ace. There are no other private airstrips in <br /> the vicinity of the pxoject area. There would be no impacts to airport safety. (No Impact} <br /> g)Impaitimplementation ofo.rphysicallytnterfere with an adopted emergencyrespo�se <br /> plan or emergency evacr�atia�plarl? <br /> The praposed project would not interfere with any emergency response and evaluation plans. The <br /> proposed construction activities would occur underneath the US 101 bridge or oa lands owned by <br /> the City,outside designed roadways. All majar roads and evacuat�on routes would be accessible <br /> during construction. The City would design the proposed joint-use path to be capable of <br /> accammodating passage of a fight duty emergenc�vehicle should access be needed in the event an <br /> emergencp. {Less than Significant Impact} <br /> 2-40 US 10� Pedestrian Undercro.rsing rand Bair <br /> Lrland Road Storrr� Drdin Pu��i Station Project <br />