My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Browse
Search
Agmt13 URS Corporation
RedwoodCity
>
City Clerk
>
Agreements
>
2010-2019
>
2013
>
Agmt13 URS Corporation
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/11/2016 5:25:52 PM
Creation date
10/23/2013 10:39:57 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Agreement
Contractor Name
URS Corporation
PROJECT NAME
101/84 (Woodside Road) Interchange Project Approval & Environmental Document (PA&ED)
RMP File Number
304
Date
10/22/2013
MO Ref
13-184
Amendment
Yes
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
99
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
environmental documentation that covers the project area but is not readily available <br /> electronically or online, such as from CITY public works efforts (creek and channel maintenance <br /> programs, outfall projects, etc.). This research will help to establish the project setting, previous <br /> resource agency consultation, and known public concerns, including far cumulative impacts <br /> discussions (in the Natural Environment Study, Biological Assessment, and environmental <br /> document) and for future public outreach efforts. <br /> CONSULTANT will coordinate a kick-off ineeting for the environmental phase with the CITY, <br /> Caltrans, and the PDT to review and refine the work program and schedule, concur on critical <br /> milestones, and determine appropriate paths of communication. This task includes initial review <br /> of the project and early consultation with Caltrans and other responsible or interested agencies. <br /> CONSULTANT assumes that environmental studies will be performed on two build alternatives. <br /> Based on the Environmental Scoping Checklist in the 2011 Alternatives Study and input from <br /> technical specialists,the following environmental studies are anticipated. <br /> Subtask S.1.2-Project Purpose and Need/Project Description <br /> The Purpose and Need and Project Description will be developed in coordination with the CITY, <br /> Caltrans and the PDT. CONSULTANT will draft a preliminary Purpose and Need that addresses <br /> capacity, transportation demand, and safety; roadway deficiencies; modal interrelationships and <br /> system linkages; and other topics as appropriate, consistent with Caltrans requirements. When <br /> consensus is reached on the scope of the study alternatives, a detailed description of the proposed <br /> project will be prepared for review and acceptance by the CITY, Caltrans, and the PDT. The <br /> preliminary Purpose and Need and Project Description will be based on existing project <br /> engineering and traffic documents, discussion with the engineering team, and research on the <br /> historic transportation setting of the project area. CONSULTANT will develop mapping and/or <br /> graphics as appropriate to illustrate the existing constraints of the interchange. The format of the <br /> Purpose and Need and Project Description will follow the current Caltrans guidance. An <br /> abbreviated project description will also be prepared for use in the environmental technical <br /> studies. <br /> The modification of the US 101/Woodside Road interchange and the addition of ramps at Maple <br /> Street were included in San Mateo County Tax Measure A, approved in June 1988, as part of the <br /> planned improvements to US 101. The Purpose and Need will therefore be drafted to directly <br /> relate or build from the original designation, intent, and funding for the project, and to address <br /> goals defined to improve safety and congestion relief consistent with Measure A's intent, and <br /> improve traffic circulation to accommodate regional and local growth. <br /> Subtask S.1.3-Alternatives Consideration <br /> The CITY and Caltrans have already considered multiple alternatives prior to this contract. As <br /> noted above, a detailed description will be developed of the alternatives that will be advanced for <br /> further consideration. The Project Description will also include discussion of alternatives <br /> considered but eliminated from further evaluation, based on the evaluations leading up to <br /> identification of the proposed project described in the 2011 Alternatives Study, and other <br /> relevant available existing information. This description will provide the basis for the "viable" <br /> alternatives vs. alternatives that should no longer be considered. The rationale for alternatives <br /> that have been considered but will no longer be evaluated will be documented during this early <br /> ATTY/AGR/2013.164/URS PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGR <br /> REV:10-15-13 VR <br /> Page 36 of 78 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.