AgdaPkt 2013-11-18 Special - Laserfiche WebLink

Browse Search

8.A. - Page 52 and 30-year storm level using a vault within the ground floor of the structure (Sanc&s, Engineenng Report for 525 Middlefield Roac� December 20, 2012,p. 3;also see Plan Sheets Ll.0 and C-4). The project will be subject to this reguirement as a conc&tian of project approval. YVith implementation of the above standard City regulations, project impacts on jlooc&ng will be less than significant i. The project site is not subject to,jlooc&ng from levee or dam failure (DTPP EIR p. 10-26); therefore, potential flooc&ng as a result of failure is considered minimal. Project implementafion is not anficipated to expose people or properiy to significant nskfrom levee or dam failure. j. The projectsite is not subject to inundation by seiche, tsunami, or mudflow (DTPP EIR pp. 10-26 and 10-27). Summary of Impacts Potentially Less than Signifcant Less than Significant With Mitigation Signifcant No Im act Incor orated Im act Im act X. LAND USE AND PLANNING-- YVould the project: a) Disrupt or divide the physical arrangement of a community? X b) Be incompatible with existing land use in the vicinity? X c) Conflict with any applicable land use plaq policy, or regulation of an agency X with jurisdiction over the project(including but not limited to the general plan, specific plan, local coastal program, or zoning ordinance)adopted for the purpose of avoiding or mitigating an envuonmental effect? Documentation: a. & b. The DTPP program EIR (p. 4-16) concludes that implementation of the DTPP would reinforce, with no substantial change in, established community-wide land use patterns. The EIR (p. 4-16) also concludes that the DTPP land use charactenstics, provisions, and development standards would result in beneficial land use effects. The DTPP has been incorporated into the City's General Plan. The proposed project complies with all applicable DTPP regulations and will cantribute to the beneficial land use effects in the Downtown area. c. The project will not conflict with any applicable land use plan, policy, or regulation of agencies with junsc&cfion over the project (DTPP program EIR pp. 4-18 through 4-21). The Project complies with all applicable design standards in the DTPP, and the City's Architectural Achdsory Committee (AAC) has recommended approval of the project design with minor modificafions made by the applicant per the Tuly 31, 2013 project re-submittal. No potentially significant land use or planning impacts are anticipated Summary of Impacts Potentially Less than Signifcant Less than Significant With Mitigation Signifcant No Im act Incor orated Im act Im act XL MINERAL RESOURCES -- YVould the project: a) Result in the loss of availability of a known mineral resource that would be of X value to the region and the residents of the State? b) Result in the loss of availability of a locally important mineral resource X recovery site delineated on a local general plan, specific plan or other land use plan? Documentation: a. &b. The projectsite does notcontain valuable or locally importantmineral resources, nor will itconsume extraorc&nary amounts ofmineral resources. Therefore,projectimplementation will not create an impact on mineral resources. 17