My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Browse
Search
CC Min 1998-07-06 Bdgt
RedwoodCity
>
City Clerk
>
Minutes
>
1990-1999
>
1998
>
CC Min 1998-07-06 Bdgt
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/5/2005 2:51:18 PM
Creation date
4/5/2004 11:42:19 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CC Index
CC Index - Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Type
Regular
Agency Type
City Council
Date
7/6/1998
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
27
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />give more detail to the casual reader of the Budget, so they understand that much <br />of what we are doing here has been reviewed, and reviewed very thoroughly by <br />the Council- in spite of what some candidates might say during an Election." <br /> MEMO 7/7/98 <br />Council Member Claire said, "We are a City between 70,000 and 85,000... We <br />have approximately 553 employees in this Budget, which is slightly more than the <br />525 employees we had in the 1978 Budget after passage of Prop 13 when we <br />wiped out 75 positions, if I remember correctly, and which we never replaced." <br />He said that over the past two decades City staff has grown about .6% and <br />considering the amount of work that has increased, that was remarkable. Council <br />Member Claire said Palo Alto has about 20% fewer residents and its General Fund <br />Budget is $96 million, 100% larger than Redwood City's. He said Redwood City <br />has done an excellent job of holding the line on general expenditures. He said his <br />only concern was the very large Reserve included in the Budget, equal to about <br />20% of the General Fund. Council Member Claire said San Mateo's Charter sets <br />a limit for Reserves at 5% of the General Fund. He said that during his review of <br />the Budgetary process he would be looking at whether 20% Reserves was <br />necessary, and added that the City of Palo Alto's Reserve was even higher than <br />Redwood City's. He said he didn't want needed projects put on hold while the <br />City had a Reserve of20% of the General Fund. <br /> MEMO 7/7/98 <br />Council Member Ira agreed to have the Finance Committee on which he serves, <br />review the Budget format. He also agreed that more detail would be appropriate. <br />Council Member Ira said that at the last Council Meeting, it was established that <br />about 70% of the Budget was already committed to matters such as employee <br />salaries and benefits and fixed costs, and there was not that much flexibility left in <br />the Budget. He said one area with some flexibility was Supplies and Services and <br />he wanted to review that issue. He said that people have a tendency to always <br />want the newest and the best if someone else is footing the bill. He said he <br />wanted to be sure that City money was spent wisely and not wasted, and for <br />people to see that, they needed to see more details. Council Member Ira said that <br />was an area that needed improvement, without making the Budget so thick no one <br />would want to read it. He added that it was imperative for the Council, as <br />stewards of the City's money, to exercise care and diligence during the Budgetary <br />process. <br /> MEMO 7/7/98 <br />BUDGET STUDY SESSION MINUTE BOOK NO. 57 JULY6,1998 <br />MINUTES Page No. 054 PAGE 11 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.