My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Browse
Search
AgdaPkt 2014-01-13 Interview, Closed and Regular
RedwoodCity
>
City Clerk
>
Agenda Packets
>
2010-2019
>
2014
>
AgdaPkt 2014-01-13 Interview, Closed and Regular
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/14/2014 8:33:06 AM
Creation date
1/9/2014 9:29:21 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CC Index
CC Index - Document Type
Agenda Packet
Meeting Type
Regular
Agency Type
City Council
Date
1/13/2014
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
543
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
City of Redwood City 7.1. G. - Page 40 <br /> Management's Discussion and Analysis <br /> For the year ended June 30, 2013 <br /> At June 30, 2013, the City's governmental funds reported combined fund balances of $96 million, which <br /> reflects an increase of $4.5 million from the beginning year balance. <br /> Governmental fund revenues increased $3 million this year to $111.6 million. Significant increases <br /> occurred in the general fund, the capital outlay fund, the traffic mitigation fees fund, and the parks <br /> impact and in lieu fee fund offset by decreases in the redevelopment agency fund, the low and <br /> moderate income housing fund, the transportation grants fund, and the One Marina Community <br /> Facilities District fund revenues. Expenditures, including capital outlay, decreased $5.6 million this year <br /> to $109.9 million. Most of the decrease was attributable to the $10.3 million expenditure in the prior <br /> year for the potential state takeaway of the accumulated funds set aside pursuant to the agreement <br /> with the Legal Aid Society to use certain tax increment revenue for low and moderate income housing <br /> purposes, offset by increased expenditures in the capital outlay fund. <br /> The general fund is the primary operating fund of the City. At June 30, 2013, unassigned fund balance of <br /> the general fund was $19.4 million, while total fund balance increased to $21.8 million from a beginning <br /> fund balance of $19.8 million primarily due to an increase in revenues. As a measure of the general <br /> fund's liquidity, it may be useful to compare both unassigned fund balance and total fund balance to <br /> total fund expenditures. Unassigned fund balance represents 23.8% of total fund expenditures, while <br /> total fund balance represents 26.7% of that same amount. <br /> The following are the major funds that qualified under the reporting criteria for major funds selection: <br /> General Fund - General fund revenues increased approximately $4.1 million this fiscal year primarily due <br /> to increases in property taxes, sales and other taxes, and building permits, offset by declines in other <br /> categories of revenues. Sales taxes increased $2.2 million and transient occupancy tax increased $0.6 <br /> million due to the continued recovery from the recession and the first full year of transient occupancy <br /> tax revenue received under the voter approved increase in the transient occupancy tax rate from 10% to <br /> 12% (effective January 1, 2012). Property taxes increased $1.9 million. The increase in property tax <br /> resulted from an increase in assessed value and an increase in revenue received in the general fund <br /> from the county as its share of the Education Revenue Augmentation Fund (ERAF) refund in FY 2012/13, <br /> an increase of $680,312 for a total of $4.2 million. <br /> ERAF, which was created by state law in the early 1990's, allowed the state to shift on an ongoing basis a <br /> portion of each city, county, and special district's property taxes to school districts. This shift allowed <br /> the state to decrease the state's general fund support to schools throughout the state and <br /> concomitantly reduced state funding of schools. Within each county, ERAF revenues are allocated to <br /> schools based upon a formula that considers, among several factors, the average daily attendance and <br /> the amount of each school district's own property tax revenue. Within San Mateo County, the outcome <br /> of applying this formula was that the school districts did not require all of the funds shifted from the <br /> cities, county, and special districts. Consequently, these funds were returned to each entity in <br /> proportion to the amount that was initially collected. <br /> Licenses and permits increased $0.63 million due to an increase in building permits related to increased <br /> building activity. <br /> 12 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.