My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Browse
Search
AgdaPkt 2014-02-10 Closed and Regular
RedwoodCity
>
City Clerk
>
Agenda Packets
>
2010-2019
>
2014
>
AgdaPkt 2014-02-10 Closed and Regular
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/11/2014 9:28:06 AM
Creation date
2/6/2014 4:03:15 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CC Index
CC Index - Document Type
Agenda Packet
Meeting Type
Regular
Agency Type
City Council
Date
2/10/2014
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
253
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
7.1.A. - Page 27 <br /> typically no odor problems associated with recycled water because residual biologically-active <br /> organisms that create malodorous compounds are killed by disinfection prior to discharge of the <br /> recycled water into the storage and distribution system. All proposed conveyance facilities <br /> would be located underground and pressurized, which would reduce the potential for odor <br /> generation. No mitigation is necessary. <br /> 4. BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES.Would the project: <br /> Less Than <br /> Significant <br /> Potentially with Less Than <br /> Significant Mitigation Significant No <br /> Impact Impact Impact Impact <br /> a. Have a substantial adverse effect, either directly or <br /> through habitat modifications, on any species <br /> identified as a candidate, sensitive, or special status <br /> species in local or regional plans, policies, or <br /> regulations, or by the California Department of Fish <br /> and Game or U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service? <br /> b. Have a substantial adverse effect on any riparian <br /> habitat or other sensitive natural community <br /> identified in local or regional plans, policies, and <br /> regulations or by the California Department of Fish <br /> and Game or U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service? <br /> c. Have a substantial adverse effect on federally <br /> protected wetlands as defined by Section 404 of the <br /> Clean Water Act(including, but not limited to, marsh, <br /> vernal pool, coastal, etc.)through direct removal, <br /> filling, hydrological interruption, or other means? <br /> d. Interfere substantially with the movement of any <br /> native resident or migratory fish or wildlife species or <br /> with established native resident or migratory wildlife x <br /> corridors, or impede the use of native wildlife nursery <br /> sites? <br /> e. Conflict with any local policies or ordinances <br /> protecting biological resources, such as a tree x <br /> preservation policy or ordinance? <br /> f. Conflict with the provisions of an adopted Habitat <br /> Conservation Plan, Natural Community Conservation <br /> Plan, or other approved local, regional, or state x <br /> habitat conservation plan? <br /> ANALYSIS: The project footprint covers two main areas of different biological value: Greater Bayfront, <br /> and Central Redwood City. The Central Redwood City area is entirely urbanized and, because pipeline <br /> 13 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.