Laserfiche WebLink
7.1.A. - Page 29 <br /> 6. GEOLOGY AND SOILS.Would the project: <br /> Less Than <br /> Significant <br /> Potentially with Less Than <br /> Significant Mitigation Significant No <br /> Impact Impact Impact Impact <br /> a. Expose people or structures to potential substantial <br /> adverse effects, including the risk of loss, injury, or <br /> death involving: <br /> (i) Rupture of a known earthquake fault, as delineated <br /> on the most recent Alquist Priolo Earthquake Fault <br /> Zoning Map issued by the State Geologist for the area <br /> or based on other substantial evidence of a known <br /> fault? <br /> (ii)Strong seismic ground shaking? <br /> (iii)Seismic-related ground failure, including <br /> liquefaction? <br /> (iv) Landslides? x <br /> b. Result in substantial soil erosion or the loss of topsoil? <br /> c. Be located on a geologic unit or soil that is unstable, or <br /> that would become unstable as a result of the project, <br /> and potentially result in on-or off-site landslide, x <br /> lateral spreading, subsidence, liquefaction or collapse? <br /> d. Be located on expansive soil, as defined in Table 18-1- <br /> B of the Uniform Building Code (1994), creating x <br /> substantial risks to life or property? <br /> e. Have soils incapable of adequately supporting the use <br /> of septic tanks or alternative waste water disposal <br /> systems where sewers are not available for the x <br /> disposal of waste water? <br /> ANALYSIS: The project would not create new geologic hazards that could damage project facilities. <br /> Therefore,this section focuses on the effect of geologic conditions on project facilities. <br /> Seismicity—The project area is located within the seismically active San Francisco Bay area. The <br /> area is located about 7 miles northeast of the San Andreas Fault and about 12 miles southwest <br /> 15 <br />