My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Browse
Search
CC Min 1998-01-26
RedwoodCity
>
City Clerk
>
Minutes
>
1990-1999
>
1998
>
CC Min 1998-01-26
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/5/2005 2:43:44 PM
Creation date
4/5/2004 12:35:41 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CC Index
CC Index - Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Type
Regular
Agency Type
City Council
Date
1/26/1998
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
20
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br /> ACM Moore displayed a parking map of the downtown area that indicated the locations <br /> of IO-hour parking meters, 2-hour parking meters, and 36-minute meters. She said there <br /> are a total of 1,507 parking meters in Redwood City: 916 (61 %) are on-street, and 591 <br /> (39%) are off-street. She stated that each meter costs approximately $70 to maintain <br /> ($105,246 per year to maintain and operate); parking structure permit fees are $20 per <br /> month; parking lots permit fees are $15 per; and current hours of enforcement are Monday <br /> through Friday, 8:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m. <br /> ACM Moore described the impact to the General Fund: Scenario A generates $28,205; <br /> Scenario B would create a loss of $168,989; and Scenario C would create a loss of <br /> $250,094. She advised that removal of all the meters in the downtown area would require <br /> approximately 2,000 casual hours for enforcement at a cost of $27,720 per year. <br /> ACM Moore said the perception of local business people was that parking meters would <br /> negatively impact their businesses and the lack of parking enforcement on Broadway <br /> would negatively impact the merchants. She said if on-street meters were removed there <br /> was a concern that downtown employees might become abusers by parking on the streets <br /> rather than in the lots. She said there was little support to removing all the meters because <br /> it would result in a large negative impact and would result in significant abuses of ITee <br /> parking. ACM Moore said the study included surveying other cities, other Chambers of <br /> Commerce and business associations, and these groups indicated support for parking <br /> meters. <br /> ACM Moore said staff recommended an increase in the parking meter violation fine ITom <br /> $10 to $15, and raising the meter rate, which would encourage the purchase of monthly <br /> permits;. changing the times of some of the meters in certain areas; and continued Police <br /> enforcement in the downtown area. <br /> ACM Moore said the overall recommendation would be to keep the current parking <br /> meters in place. She advised that parking needs would continue to change in the <br /> downtown area as new economic development opportunities arose, and this concern should <br /> be addressed through a "managed parking plan." <br /> Council and staff thoroughly discussed the purpose of further study and appropriate time <br /> lines. <br /> In response to Council questions regarding findings to remove the meters, City Attorney <br /> Schricker said, "The parking meters are not contractually required any more. The original <br /> reason for placing the meters was to payoff bonds that were used to build the off-street <br /> parking facilities. Those bonds have been retired, so if you could do away with the notion <br /> that there is a contractual requirement for them, that might assist you. What this statement <br /> says is that you don't need the meters to raise the money that you need to run the City.... <br /> There is another related financial aspect, and that is the $1.3 million encumbrance on a <br /> fund. It is an inter-fund transfer that occurred some years ago that would have to be <br /> REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING MINUTE BOOK NO. 56 JANUARY 26,1998 <br /> MINUTES Page No. 182 PAGE 10 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.