Laserfiche WebLink
<br /> . . . . . - <br /> 2. Open public hearing; <br /> - Mayor Pro Tern Ruskin opened the public hearing at 8:28 p.m. <br /> 3. Hear public comment: <br /> Bill Ruck, a manager with the parent company owning KNBR Radio, located at 1410 <br /> Radio Road, said the facility had been located at the Redwood Shores site for 65 years. <br /> He said his company had a vested interest in maintaining that site, and he was available <br /> to answer any Council question. Mr. Ruck said he would work with the Subcommittee <br /> to make sure that "our interests are met, as well as everybody else's." <br /> Don Warren, 125 Stonybrook Road, Los Gatos, said he has had a long involvement <br /> with the subject property, but was not representing anyone at this meeting. He said a <br /> period of ten months is a significant period of time when "you are a taxpayer and the <br /> tax bill meter is running on your property. It is a significant amount of time if you <br /> have plans or ideas of what you might want to do with your property. It is a significant <br /> amount of time if you have some transaction either contemplative or underway." Mr. <br /> Warren said he would like clarification on what property owners could do during the <br /> moratorium. He asked, "Will property owners have the opportunity during this time to <br /> interface with the City staff if they desire to begin implementation processing for ideas <br /> that they may have on the site, or to ask questions about changes in land use or changes <br /> in property ownership?" <br /> - <br /> Planner Passanisi, said, "Yes. Any developer or applicant who is interested in any of <br /> those parcels will certainly be able to contact staff and review proposals or projects <br /> with us, with the understanding that we may not give a definite answer until the <br /> moratorium is complete, and we have done our homework on the subcommittee. But <br /> certainly they will be able to approach staff and we will work with them." <br /> City Attorney Schricker said, "The legal purpose for the moratorium... had to do <br /> with questions regarding a great deal of discussion, and to some extent controversy, <br /> involving the properties in that area. Legally, what the City is compelled to do during <br /> this period of time, is to assess the areas with the very purpose of determining an <br /> appropriate zoning classification, whether it be existing zoning classification or a brand <br /> new zoning classification, or an existing classification other than the "Tidal Plain" <br /> zoning. In that context, it is my understanding that the subcommittee's function is to <br /> get as much input from the property owners, and certainly the City owes it as an <br /> obligation to the property owners to get input in that connection, in order to provide <br /> this hearing process, so that when the matter comes back to the City Council there has <br /> been a legislative process before it even gets back to the City Council that has allowed <br /> this somewhat studied process to go forward. I would recommend that staff contact <br /> the owners of the property, and I think they already have, to get that very information." <br /> - <br /> REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING MINUTE BOOK NO. 56 FEBRUARY 23.1998 <br /> MINUTES Page No. 287 PAGE 10 <br />