CC Min 1998-04-27 - Laserfiche WebLink

Browse Search

I. . . . . - Council Member Leipzig said it was important for the Council to protect free speech and the First Amendment. He said image was important. Council Member Leipzig said that he believed the salability of nearby properties was impacted, although he - wasn't sure the Council should be discussing that. Council Member Leipzig said, just not wanting that kind of a business in the area, wasn't a sufficient reason for him to support the proposed ordinance. He said that from a policy standpoint Council Members shouldn't be looking at that. Council Member Leipzig said they needed to "look at a reasonableness, and this ordinance is reasonable. There is sufficient area available. It is not as if we were saying we are eliminating these businesses entirely in the City. We are giving them the opportunity to move within a reasonable time.... I think that meets the test of reasonableness for me, and protection of free speech and the First Amendment." Council Member Ruskin said he concurred with the staff Report that this type of business needs to be regulated in Redwood City. He addressed the amortization schedule and said that several cities did not grandfather in existing businesses when they adopted regulating SOB ordinances, including Mountain View, Palo Alto, San Carlos, San Jose, Sunnyvale and South San Francisco. Council Member Ruskin said that if a business is of such an unusual nature that it is Constitutional and in the interest of the community to regulate it to a greater extent than most or all other businesses, "then it also seems clear to me that it is both Constitutional and wise to regulate the current businesses that fall into this category. If we are going to go to regulating this business in general, it makes sense that you would also want to apply the standards to current businesses.... It would seem unwise to leave businesses that are currently in the - same category, where they are, when we are preparing for future businesses to be more thoroughly regulated." Mayor Howard said she wanted to treat all sexually oriented businesses like the City had treated sexually oriented magazines in convenience stores. She said they are no longer allowed to be displayed or accessed physically or visibly. She said this ordinance would do the same thing, by removing SOBs from highly visible locations, particularly in sensitive areas. Mayor Howard said the ordinance was well thought out and she supported it. She said that after the proposed ordinance was adopted, she would like to meet with the County Board of Supervisors to encourage them to adopt a similar ordinance, and eventually regulate all SOBs along EI Camino Real. Council Member Claire described former Mayor Britschgi's efforts to address this issue, and said, "this is a long time coming." REITERATION OF THE MOTIONS. INTRODUCTION OF AMENDMENTS AND ORDINANCES 1. MIS; IRAlRUSKIN TO INTRODUCE ORDINANCE ADDING ARTICLE 27 TO ORDINANCE NO. 1130, THE REDWOOD CITY ZONING ORDINANCE RELATING TO SEXUALLY ORIENTED BUSINESSES, INCLUDING SECTION - REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING MINUTE BOOK NO. 56 APRIL 27,1998 MINUTES Page No. 417 PAGE 14