Laserfiche WebLink
<br /> '. . . . I . <br /> Mr. Smith described the public meetings staff held with the neighbors and the <br /> Neighborhood Association. He said the people who attended the meetings were very, very <br /> supportive of the recommendations, and in fact some attendees asked for more speed <br />- humps, and some recommended blocking people from cutting through altogether. Mr. <br /> Smith said about one half of the 1,300 homes were on streets rather protected from the <br /> effects of traffic, and more stringent controls would cause a great inconvenience to those <br /> households. Mr. Smith said a graduated response at this time would allow a stepped up <br /> response later on if necessary. He said the first phase would be the installation of the <br /> thirteen speed humps and traffic conditions would be monitored. He said if further steps <br /> were needed they would be employed at that time. Mr. Smith described the mailing sent <br /> to property owners on the affected blocks and said they received no objections. <br /> In response to Council Member Leipzig's questions, Mr. Smith said the mailings went to <br /> property owners with a request that the owners consult their renters regarding this issue. <br /> He said there were some difficulties getting the Post Office to deliver mailings to unnamed <br /> occupants, although it seems people do not seem to have any trouble receiving mail <br /> addressed to "occupant." Council Member Leipzig said he had no difficulty with these <br /> kinds of mailing and offered to help staff in that area. He also suggested that in the future <br /> staff make an effort to reach the renters who might make up as much as 50% of the <br /> neighborhood. In response to Council Member Leipzig's next question, Mr. Smith said <br /> he thought the result of these speed humps would slow traffic down rather than divert a <br /> great deal of it to Woodside Road. He said the primary goal was to have drivers act <br /> responsibly. <br />- In response to Council Member Claire's questions, Mr. Smith said staff had not planned <br /> any speed humps for Central due to its north/south direction and its use as a primary route <br /> for emergency response vehicles. He said staff wanted to try other speed controls first, <br /> such as heavily marking streets and the use of Bot's dots. He said speed humps on Central <br /> has not been ruled out. <br /> In response to Council Member Rain's questions, Mr. Smith said speed humps are new <br /> devices to Redwood City and the fire department has not had experience with them. He <br /> said staff had talked with the fire department, police department and engineering and <br /> decided that as a first phase they would not involve the north/south streets. <br /> City Manager Everett said that once the City's personnel have experience with these <br /> traffic controls, it will be easier to decide the best way to solve traffic problems during the <br /> second phase. <br /> In response to Council Member Rain's questions regarding delays caused by speed <br /> humps, Mr. Smith said each operating environment is different, but he didn't feel there <br /> would be any operating consequences to emergency services because the streets are <br /> already so constraining. <br /> Mayor Howard commended Mr. Smith and Mr. Haygood for the way in which they <br />- listened to the neighbors and answered all their questions so clearly. <br /> REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING MINUTE BOOK NO. 56 APRIL 27, \998 <br /> MINUTES Page No. 421 PAGE 18 <br />