Laserfiche WebLink
<br /> . . . . . - <br /> <br /> Director Ingram described the projects that could be funded through this process to <br /> address flooding, the same projects Senior Engineer Chang described during the CIP <br />- presentation to Council and said had to be done in concert to get it all to work: <br /> I) Replace 5th Avenue pump station; <br /> 2) Dredge Bayfront Canal and improve/add height to levee; <br /> 3) Construct new tide gate at south end of Bayfront Canal; <br /> 4) Improve Friendly Acres/5th Avenue collection system. <br /> Director Ingram said the "rough order of magnitude of these projects would be $12 <br /> million" and the benefits would be, to increase flood protection up to a 10 to 30 year <br /> storm event. He said that right now the system could handle about a 3-year event, <br /> although it actually appears to be a one-year in some places, since there is flooding every <br /> year in some areas. Director Ingram said the flooding problem would never be "solved - <br /> you can never do that reasonably without dramatic and unpalatable changes. But you can <br /> at least raise the level of protection to a level that is consistent with other communities in <br /> the area." <br /> City Manager Everett cautioned everyone not to lock onto the $12 million guesstimate, <br /> as that might be off by 50% on the low side, and he didn't want anyone to be <br /> disappointed. He repeated that "we will not solve the flooding problems. We can become <br /> 30 times better because it is a one year flood and we go to 30 which is a huge difference... <br /> but all last January and February we would have been flooded. We cannot put an <br />- expectation out that once we do this they shouldn't flood." <br /> Director Ingram described the other projects and funding requirements that are known. <br /> 5) Multi-jurisdictional improvements (south), about $1-2 million? <br /> 6) Cordilleras Creek improvements, about $1-3 million? <br /> 7) "Sub-standard" streets drainage improvements, cost unknown; <br /> 8) Redwood Creek(s) storm repairs about $.6 million, possibly reimbursable by FEMA. <br /> Director Ingram said staff had arbitrarily picked $5, $10 and $15 million dollars and <br /> "ran the numbers" to see how that amount of funding would impact sewer service charges, <br /> both by fixed costs and variable costs described in the Report (on file in the City Clerk <br /> Department.) He described the changes in service charges over the next four years and <br /> the causes of one-time costs, labor costs and overtime costs. <br /> Vice Mayor Ruskin said to his colleagues that although there were very few people <br /> attending tonight's meeting, there were many, many people at the Neighborhood <br /> meetings, and many, many more who were concerned about this issue. <br /> Director Ingram described the traç1Q.ng and record keeping his department employs <br />- during extraordinary storm events that are above and beyond the normal scope of work. <br /> He said that in February, 1998 the measurable, quantifiable City dollars spent on storm <br /> Study Session MINUTE BOOK NO. 56 May 4, 1998 <br /> Minutes Page No. 443 Page 12 <br />