My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Browse
Search
CC Min 1997-11-17
RedwoodCity
>
City Clerk
>
Minutes
>
1990-1999
>
1997
>
CC Min 1997-11-17
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/29/2006 8:43:21 AM
Creation date
4/6/2004 8:22:00 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CC Index
CC Index - Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Type
Regular
Agency Type
City Council
Date
11/17/1997
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
39
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br /> - - " ., <br /> where we thought we could develop a shopping center of 120,000 square feet, and we have <br /> a successful tenant mix. I'm not as concerned for my major players in my shopping <br /> - center, but my smaller uses, often, everybody counts." <br /> An unidentified gentleman spoke from the audience opposing the Project. <br /> At 11 :25 p.m., MIS: CLAIRE/RUSKIN TO EXTEND THE MEETING TO 11:45 P.M. <br /> CARRIED BY UNANIMOUS VOICE VOTE. <br /> MINUTE ORDER NO. 97-221 <br /> Mayor Howard called on anyone else who wished to speak to this issue. <br /> John Jordan, 809 Southport Drive, said he agreed that there was insufficient notification, <br /> and he had not been notified. Mr. Jordan said he was concerned about any future sales of <br /> commercial properties, including the KNBR property on Radio Road, and expressed his <br /> opposition to the Project. <br /> Patriek Gamon, 376 Meridian Drive, said the Traffic Report discussed possible widening <br /> of roads as possible mitigations, and asked, "Wouldn't that suggest that perhaps there was <br /> a problem with the planning in the beginning? Also, my other issue is that I do have, for <br /> anybody here, an e-mail list that they can find outside, and that is for community alert." <br /> Wayne Chin, 104 Camerota Way, said. "It doesn't make sense to put a business office all <br /> - the way into the deepest part of Redwood Shores. When almost all of the business is <br /> closer to the freeway. You are bringing elements deep into a Redwood Shores residential <br /> area that really shouldn't be there. You are introducing elements that don't live at the <br /> Shores, introducing people that don't even realize the Shores even exists.... people that <br /> don't belong there, and have no interest in protecting the area. Right now you don't have a <br /> police station out there like Foster City" and they have a crime problem. "If you call a <br /> police officer you will get a guy out there in maybe thirty minutes at the very most. Ifwe <br /> have crime problems out there I want to know how we are going to handle it. I don't <br /> support putting up an office building out there at all." <br /> Ben Ploshay, 2 Waterside Circle, said this was his second appearance, and said there was <br /> a lack of communication. He asked, "last time you promised to have a meeting out there <br /> once or twice a year in Redwood Shores, when are you going to involve the Redwood <br /> Shores homeowners?" <br /> Lee Ann Crabtree-Sprick, 47 Dockside Circle, said she had heard many incongruencies <br /> in the presentations by the developer, his lawyer and the traffic consultant. She said, "A <br /> lot of things happened in 1992 and 1993 that the honorable board here had nothing to do <br /> with. However, there must have been some vision as to what was to happen in the Shores. <br /> I'd like to call to everyone's attention that the demographics are different, the residential <br /> mix is different, as is the business mix. And I think those things need to be taken into <br /> - consideration and looking at point number 2, a reasonable Master Plan. I do believe <br /> REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING MINUTE BOOK NO. 56 NOVEMBER 17,1997 <br /> MINUTES Page No. 061 PAGE 30 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.