Laserfiche WebLink
<br /> County. "It is ultimately the County who will award the contract to one of the successful <br /> bidders. We are a piece of that, in that our effort has been to negotiate agreements with <br /> companies that anticipate putting in a bid to the County, due January 5." The County will <br /> then go through its evaluation process and will award the contract in April. <br /> San Mateo City Manager Croee explained how different this item was than others that <br /> come before the Council, "because you are not being asked tonight to approve a contract. <br /> It is not a contract that you will award. It is a contract that you will be a party to, through <br /> your participation in the Joint Powers Agency. But you are not being asked to choose, is <br /> this contract better than the other contract. We do have two very different agreements." <br /> He said the issue is, "Is there something in one of the contracts that says you could not live <br /> with that contract, recognizing that we could ultimately end up being parties to either of <br /> those contracts." If the answer is yes, then "it might be prudent to withdraw from the <br /> JP A." City Manager Croce said it depended upon where the City wanted to be in terms of <br /> providing advanced life support services. If the City wanted to provide such first <br /> responder services, then "I believe it makes sense to remain a part of the JP A" as part of <br /> the County system, which will have financial reimbursement benefits. <br /> San Mateo City Manager Croce described the two proposed agreements and explained <br /> their differences, with AMR a more straightforward contractor, and Rural Metro more of a <br /> joint venture. He described other agreements involved in the process and time lines for the <br /> JPA Board and County's approval process. <br /> In response to Couneil Member Hartnett's questions regarding the public process and <br /> possible changes, City Manager Croee said the JP A had committed not to change the <br /> proposed contracts once they were submitted to the IP A and executed by the two corporate <br /> offices of those two companies. He said he was not sure what could be done at the County <br /> level. City Manager Croce further answered that each agency, Councils, Fire Districts and <br /> labor organizations, would consider the exact same proposal. <br /> In response to Couneil Member Hartnett's questions regarding operational issues, <br /> Redwood City Fire Chief Montez said neither contract posed any operational problems, <br /> and the Redwood City Fire Department was ready to integrate with the ALS providers. <br /> City Manager Croee said it was his understanding that both agreements were acceptable <br /> and workable to the JPA, and it would be up to the Board of Supervisors to make the final <br /> decision. <br /> In response to Mayor Howard's questions regarding consolidated dispatch systems, City <br /> Manager Everett said, "With the support of the previous Chief and labor, we got into <br /> NetSix" a consolidated Dispatch system, and it has worked extremely well. <br /> Mayor Howard commented on HMOs, reimbursements and capitation. She said <br /> capitation was a real concern and it had to be recognized as a potential problem and <br /> included in projected costs. <br /> REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING MINUTE BOOK NO. 56 DECEMBER 8,1997 <br /> MINUTES Page No. 098 PAGE 13 <br />