Laserfiche WebLink
<br /> I I I III <br /> <br /> Affidavits of mailing and publication of Notice of Hearing are on file in the City Clerk <br /> Department. <br />'-- <br /> 1. Staff report; <br /> REPORT: Senior Planner Jany, January 27,1997 <br /> Senior Planner Jany presented the staff report giving an overview of the zoning <br /> process and how it regulates the granting of variances. He advised: <br /> "In order to grant variances ITom established Codes and Ordinances, there has to be a <br /> burden of proof that special or unique circumstances exist pertaining to the subject <br /> property and nowhere else, particularly not the neighboring lots." If it is not unique, <br /> then a precedent would be set and what was approved for the subject lot would then be <br /> acceptable for all similar lots in the City. <br /> "There cannot be a grant of special privilege. In this case the Zoning Administrator's <br /> actions must be consistent in support of past actions, policies and future direction for <br /> the City. There is also a fairness and parity issue, "" especially if one application has <br /> consequences over a multitude oflots, and is expected to fit whole neighborhoods. <br /> "The approval has to meet the rules of the Zoning Ordinance, the health, safety and <br /> welfare portion. That is the main concern here. We have to look at zoning, existing <br />'-- land use and the general plan." <br /> Senior Planner Jany described the background of this variance application and said <br /> staff did a neighborhood analysis and looked at the location of similar conditions in <br /> Redwood City. "The neighborhood is primarily Single Family Residences and has <br /> some duplexes and a scattering of higher density apartments dating back to the 1960s. <br /> It is primarily a single family neighborhood." <br /> Senior Planner Jany said the application was denied, "not because of the design of <br /> the project, but rather because of the Findings." He said although adding to the <br /> housing stock, especially affordable housing, is always an extremely important <br /> consideration, the potential impacts and consequences of granting a variance for a <br /> triplex on this lot were unacceptable to staff. Planning Commission Chairman Bursak <br /> and Member Giannini told Jany they agreed that triplexes should not be allowed on 50- <br /> foot lots. (The Planning Commission and the Housing and Human Concerns <br /> Committee are studying how to increase housing in Redwood City.) <br /> Senior Planner Jany showed overheads and said there are currently 200 developable <br /> lots in Redwood City that do not require a variance. However, there are currently 89 <br /> parcels similar to the subject property that would require a variance, and those lots are <br />---- concentrated in three neighborhoods. 59% of them are in the subject neighborhood. <br /> REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING MINUTE BOOK NO. 55 JANUARY27,1997 <br /> MINUTES Page No. 109 PAGE 6 <br />