Laserfiche WebLink
<br /> Edgar Ugarte, Program Manager for San Mateo County Transportation Authority, <br /> said construction on the next auxiliary lane will begin in the spring of the year 2000 <br /> and will take place between Ralston and Hillsdale on and off ramps. <br /> Council Members urged Director Goode and Manager Ugarte to keep the pressure <br /> on CalTrans to address the more pressing needs for auxiliary lanes at the Woodside <br /> Interchange as well as others in Redwood City within the 101 corridor. <br /> MEMO 2/4/97 <br /> City Manager Everett urged the Council, and the Council agreed to contact state <br /> and local representatives, as well as the members of the Legislature's Transportation <br /> Committees to alert them to the need for faster action on transportation issues in <br /> Redwood City. Staff will provide background material for Council use. <br /> MEMO 2/4/97 <br /> 3. Extension of Route 84-Marsh Road to Seaport Boulevard, Preliminary Design: <br /> Edgar Ugarte, SMCT A Program Manage r (702); <br /> REPORT: Alignment Alternatives for Route 84 Extension ITom Marsh Road to <br /> Woodside Road/Seaport Boulevard in San Mateo County Prepared for San Mateo <br /> County Transportation Authority, December 5, 1996 <br /> Manager Ugarte described the five alternatives which all assumed that the City will <br /> realign E. Bayshore with Blomquist at Seaport Boulevard. <br /> City Manager Everett and the Council said none of the Alternatives address the <br /> issue of the traffic problems at the Woodside/Seaport Interchange, and it didn't <br /> make sense for the City to pay for the realignment project at Blomquist. Also, they <br /> had serious concerns about the impacts on Mobile Home Parks and businesses on E. <br /> Bayshore Road. <br /> Manager Ugarte said the Route 84 Extension would be Step No.1 in traffic <br /> mitigation at the WoodsidelSeaport Interchange. However, the City Manager and <br /> Council Members voiced their concerns that Steps 2, 3 and 4 might never happen if <br /> Step No. I was done, and CalTrans, Menlo Park and Atherton would never be <br /> motivated to spend the resources to address the issue, although residents and <br /> businesses of those jurisdictions are big users of that Interchange. <br /> 4. Redwood Shores Traffic Assessment District: City Staff (702); <br /> REPORT: Shores Transportation Improvement District (STID), Final Report, <br /> January 30, 1997, prepared by Brian Kangas Foulk (Phase II, building <br /> on the 1987 Crain Study and Phase One BKF Report.) <br /> ADJOURNED REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING MINUTE BOOK NO. 55 FEBRUARY 3, 1997 <br /> MINUTES Page No. 128 PAGE 7 <br />