Laserfiche WebLink
8.A. - Page 75 <br /> efforts to meet its and the region's housing needs. (General Plan, pp. H-14, H- <br /> 106). The General Plan also encourages multi-unit housing, which "can provide <br /> affordable options for individuals and families" (General Plan, p. H-37), as well as <br /> Planned Development Permit applications, such as this one which creates <br /> innovative housing, recreational opportunities, functional and aesthetic <br /> relationships with development and surrounding area (General Plan, p. H-88). <br /> The Project meets these goals by providing multi-unit housing in a unique <br /> waterfront setting. <br /> F. The City Is Not Required to Compel the Owner Not to Change Pete's <br /> Harbor <br /> Appellant's Position: Pete's Harbor is an historic resource that will be lost if the <br /> Project proceeds. (2012 Memorandum, pp. 10-11 .) <br /> City's response: The prior iteration of the Project also would have resulted in loss <br /> of live-aboard boat slips, removal of the restaurant, and architectural features <br /> which Appellant considers worthy of preservation. The site was not identified as a <br /> potentially historical resource in the EIR. (See Chapter 14.) The EIR, certified <br /> and never challenged, is irrefutably deemed valid. Also, Pete's Harbor is not <br /> considered an historic site under the City's Historic Preservation Ordinance <br /> (Chapter 40 of the Municipal Code). Moreover, there are no longer any live- <br /> aboards residing at Pete's Harbor. <br />