AgdaPkt 2014-03-24 Closed and Regular

Browse Search

8.A. - Page 108 Addendum No. 2 conclusions Section 2 of the 2014 Addendum No. 2 (Attachment 5) describes the specific differences between the current Pete's Harbor Project and the 2003 EIR project. Section 3 of Addendum No. 2 describes how the differences between the current Pete's Harbor project and the 2003 EIR project affect the impact and mitigation conclusions of the 2003 EIR. A summary of the revised impacts and mitigation measures is included in Table 1 .1 of Addendum No. 2, which verifies that the revisions incorporated in the current Pete's Harbor project would not result in new significant environmental effects or a substantial increase in the severity of the significant effects identified in the certified 2003 EIR. Public Outreach: The City conducted two Open Houses, on November 9th and November 13th of 2013, to gather input and answer questions regarding the Project. City Staff and the Applicant's team attended both Open Houses so the public could obtain a wide range of information regarding the project, including the project's history, design, environmental review and public access. The City also collected comment cards and provided boards for written comments. A Town Hall meeting then was conducted by the City on November 20th to respond to comments, answer many of the common questions being put forth and to take additional questions. The City also provided a background document with "Frequently Asked Questions" (FAQ's) at all three meetings, and an updated copy of the FAQ's is posted on the City's website. This input was communicated to the Applicant for their consideration and possible incorporation into the Project design. Specific outreach also occurred with U.S. Fish & Wildlife, BCDC, State Lands Commission, County of San Mateo and San Carlos Airport. Public Notification: The Planning Commission public hearing notice was published in the Redwood City Daily News on January 24, 2014. Effort was made to ensure that all interested parties were notified of this public hearing through a variety of means including an electronic mailing list, the City web page, posting City venues, and direct mail. The following mailing lists were used: • Adjacent property owners and tenants within 300 foot radius • BCDC, C/CAG, San Francisco Regional Water Quality Board, California Department of Fish and Game and the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (responsible agencies). • State Lands Commission, • Save the Bay, Diana Reddy, and Chamber of Commerce (interested parties), and • On-site postings at Pete's Harbor, Villas at Bair Island, Marina Pointe and One Marina.