Laserfiche WebLink
v c_) <br /> Potential Potential <br /> o <br /> Significance Significance <br /> Without Mitigation With N a <br /> Impacts Mitigation Mitigation Measures Responsibility Mitigation N, o <br /> 0 0 <br /> shortfall of 75 spaces. The applicant has requested tailors parking demand to availability within the .A n <br /> two parking modifications per Article 46.7.A.6 and development complex provides for maintenance of a <br /> Article 30 of the Redwood City Zoning Ordinance,to 10 percent margin of available parking at all times, <br /> allow less than the Code-required number of parking and includes provisions for routine monitoring of <br /> spaces"if it is determined [by the City]that the parking use, continuing for three years following <br /> proposed development will provide an environment project buildout; and includes design provisions to <br /> of physical and functional desirability, in harmony permit parking expansion to be readily <br /> with the character of the surrounding neighborhood accommodated on-site, perhaps through the ability <br /> or district." to construct additional parking decks, if such a need <br /> is indicated by the parking monitoring program. <br /> The current Parking Management Plan does not yet <br /> incorporate a level of design and management detail Any future parking expansion shall not exceed the <br /> to permit full evaluation of parking adequacy--e.g., adopted per use parking space requirements of the <br /> the relationships between the location of the various City, and shall incorporate design features that, to <br /> parking provisions and associated residential and the satisfaction of the City, reduce potential adverse <br /> public recreational demands,the adequacy and land use compatibility or visual impacts to less-than- <br /> competence of project parking management and significant levels(e.g., locations behind structures, <br /> security provisions(defensive design features, architectural features,vegetative screening); and <br /> exterior and interior lighting, security surveillance <br /> and monitoring equipment, etc.), and adequacy of (3) parking control and security provisions that may <br /> provision for interaction between project security include, but are not limited to, a full-time, on-site <br /> personnel and the Redwood City Police Department. security and monitoring operation (e.g., security <br /> personnel, surveillance cameras, emergency <br /> If one or more of the parking design objectives telephones, adequate security lighting, adequate <br /> identified above(total spaces, convenient proximity, patrolling, adequate emergency access, and <br /> and adequate control and security)are not met, the adequate coordination between project security <br /> project on-site parking provisions could be operations and Redwood City Policy Department <br /> inadequate, could result in overflow parking and operations). <br /> spillover onto adjacent and nearby streets, and <br /> could result in inordinate patrolling and enforcement Implementation of these measures would reduce <br /> demands on the Redwood City Police Department. identified potential parking impacts to a less-than- <br /> Either of these effects would represent a significant significant level. <br /> co <br /> impact. < <br /> m <br /> a <br /> m <br /> co D <br /> -D <br /> S = Significant _ <br /> LS = Less than significant j 71; <br /> SU = Significant unavoidable impact o c0 <br /> NA = Not applicable <br /> T:I10695 Pete's Harbor EIR Addendumlrevised addendum no 21Table 1-1(10695-01).doc <br />