Laserfiche WebLink
L <br /> Potential Potential > <br /> co co <br /> vD <br /> Significance Significance <br /> Without Mitigation With N -o <br /> Impacts Mitigation Mitigation Measures Responsibility Mitigation � <br /> 0 <br /> cp <br /> • dead-end circulation aisles are not desirable; <br /> turnarounds shall be provided at all dead-end <br /> parking aisles; <br /> • the internal circulation plan shall be subject to <br /> review and approval by the City to ensure that <br /> adequate emergency access is provided; <br /> • direct sidewalk connections shall be provided <br /> between all buildings; and <br /> • all sidewalks should meet Americans with <br /> Disabilities Act(ADA)and City design <br /> standards. <br /> Implementation of these measures would reduce this <br /> potential internal circulation impact to a less-than- <br /> significant level. <br /> Impact 7-14: Potentially Inadequate Project S Mitigation 7-14. Design and management Applicant LS <br /> Parking Provisions. In order for the project to measures shall be incorporated into the project to <br /> comply with City parking requirements and meet ensure that adequate peak-period parking provisions <br /> other applicable parking design standards and are provided within convenient proximity to users, <br /> common practice, parking for all project residential and designed and managed to meet the parking <br /> units and recreational provisions would have to be control and security concerns of the Redwood City <br /> contained on-site, in numbers and configurations Police Department. The design and management <br /> which are sufficient to meet peak-period parking measures shall include the following: <br /> demands for these project uses and which are within <br /> convenient proximity to users. The project parking (1) parking space-by-location provisions that are <br /> provisions must also be designed and managed to adequate in number and convenient in proximity to <br /> meet the parking control and security concerns of projected peak residential and recreational (public <br /> the City. Based on City code requirements, the access)land uses; <br /> proposed project would be required to provide 958 m <br /> vehicle parking spaces. The project, as proposed, (2) an ongoing Parking Management Program, <br /> would provide 883 parking spaces, leaving a prepared for City staff review and approval,that m <br /> -0 > <br /> S = Significant a m _ <br /> LS = Less than significant s a <br /> SU = Significant unavoidable impact 3 o <br /> NA = Not applicable <br /> T:I10695 Pete's Harbor EIR Addendumlrevised addendum no 2ITable 1-1(10695-01).doc <br />