Laserfiche WebLink
L <br /> Potential Potential > <br /> vD <br /> Significance Significance <br /> Without Mitigation With N -o <br /> Impacts Mitigation Mitigation Measures Responsibility Mitigation �, ) <br /> 0 <br /> Impact 10-9: Solid Waste Diversion Impacts. S Mitigation 10-9. The final project architectural Applicant LS .ice <br /> The project has the potential to conflict with state- design shall include chutes for recyclable materials (.p <br /> mandated requirements for 50 percent solid waste immediately adjacent to the garbage chutes, or at co <br /> stream diversion if residents find the locations of another suitable location approved by the City, in the <br /> recycling bins to be too distant or inconvenient. Site wraparound building (which has a maximum height <br /> and project plans submitted at this time do not of 75 feet). Bins for storage of recyclables shall be <br /> provide enough detail to determine if adequate provided for each residential building. The City shall <br /> provisions for recycling have been included in ensure that these provisions are included in project <br /> project design. If adequate recycling provisions are construction prior to issuance of a Certificate of <br /> not ultimately included,the project could conflict with Occupancy. Implementation of this measure would <br /> state-mandated waste stream reduction reduce the impact to a less-than-significant level. <br /> requirements, representing a potentially significant <br /> impact. <br /> SOILS AND GEOLOGY <br /> Impact 11-1: Geotechnical Hazards Associated S Mitigation 11-1: As recommended by the applicant- Applicant LS <br /> with Project Grading. The interaction of existing commissioned Treadwell &Rollo preliminary <br /> geotechnical conditions on the project site with the geotechnical investigation, require the applicant to <br /> proposed grading and surface modifications--and retain a registered engineering geologist or <br /> their combined effect on surface settlement, seismic geotechnical engineer to prepare detailed, design- <br /> hazards, and soil erosion--have the potential to level geotechnical investigations to guide the design <br /> result in significant adverse effects. The applicant's of all project grading and stabilization activities. The <br /> preliminary geotechnical investigation (Treadwell& detailed, design-level geotechnical investigations <br /> Rollo, June 21, 2001)made an initial assessment of shall be performed for each of the structures <br /> these conditions, but a design-level geotechnical proposed for the project site. Subsurface conditions <br /> investigation would be needed to adequately shall be explored and laboratory tests conducted on <br /> address all grading and stabilization activities on the selected soil samples to establish strength <br /> site. Without such a study--and without the parameters for foundation design and perimeter <br /> associated supervision of an engineering geologist slope stability, and for corrosivity potential of the fill <br /> or geotechnical engineer during project grading and and Bay mud on foundation elements and buried <br /> construction--the safety and long-term stability of utilities. Specific recommendations shall be <br /> project improvements could not be assured. These developed for foundation support for each building, < <br /> possible geotechnical hazards represent a slab-on-grade floors, pavements, bulkheads, and c7)' <br /> potentially significant impact. slope inclinations for permanent slopes.The fl <br /> detailed, design-level geotechnical investigations m -013 <br /> -a > <br /> S = Significant a m <br /> LS = Less than significant a o <br /> SU = Significant unavoidable impact o c o <br /> NA = Not applicable <br /> T:110695 Pete's Harbor EIR Addendumlrevised addendum no 21Table 1-1(10695-01).doc <br />