Laserfiche WebLink
v c_) <br /> Potential Potential • < <br /> • o <br /> Significance Significance <br /> Without Mitigation With N a <br /> Impacts Mitigation Mitigation Measures Responsibility Mitigation N, o <br /> 0 0 <br /> jeopardize emergency response. Implementation of .A n <br /> this measure would reduce the impact to a less- <br /> than-significant level. <br /> Impact 10-8: Project Impacts on Parks and S Mitigation 10-8. The City Community Development Applicant LS <br /> Recreation Services. The new residents resulting Services Department and Parks, Recreation and <br /> from the project's 411 residential units would Community Services Department shall decide what, <br /> increase the demand for local parks and recreational if any, credit would be applied toward meeting the <br /> services. The City of Redwood City has not adopted project's parks and recreation needs, based on a <br /> a citywide parks standard; however, in order to total projected need of approximately 1.45 acres of <br /> maintain the City's current parks ratio of 1.7 acres of additional improved parkland and through provision <br /> parkland per 1,000 residents, approximately 1.45 of common open space. Any such determination is <br /> acres of additional improved parkland at a location subject to approval by the City Council. If <br /> or locations so as to be available for use by project determined necessary by the City,the developer <br /> residents would be required to serve the park needs shall revise the project site plan to incorporate on- <br /> of the projected 855 project residents; currently, no site parkland with amenities sufficient to serve the <br /> improved parkland exists within a convenient project residents. <br /> walking distance(e.g., less than 1/2-mile)of the <br /> project site. To help provide parks and recreation In addition,final open space and parkland area <br /> services to future development in Redwood City,the totals and design specifics shall be subject to City <br /> City has adopted a Parks Impact Fee(Ordinance approval. Any additional parkland impact could be <br /> No. 2318; October 23, 2007; Article XVI of the City mitigated through either additional on-site <br /> Code of Ordinances), which would be applied to the parkland/facilities or payment of the City-adopted <br /> proposed project. Parks Impact Fee per City Ordinance 2318. <br /> The proposed project includes approximately 1,258 Implementation of this mitigation would reduce <br /> linear feet of public acreage adjacent to Smith project impacts on park facilities and recreational <br /> Slough, including a playground, an esplanade, and programs to a less-than-significant level. <br /> viewing areas. The Pete's Harbor project on-site <br /> public open space and landscape areas would be <br /> accessible via an on-site pedestrian and bicycle path <br /> network. All public areas would be ADA-accessible. <br /> co <br /> Project effects on City parks and recreation services m <br /> would represent a potentially significant impact. <br /> co D <br /> -D <br /> S = Significant • _ <br /> LS = Less than significant j 7/; <br /> SU = Significant unavoidable impact 03cr <br /> NA = Not applicable <br /> T:I10695 Pete's Harbor EIR Addendumlrevised addendum no 21Table 1-1(10695-01).doc <br />