My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Browse
Search
AgdaPkt 2014-03-24 Closed and Regular
RedwoodCity
>
City Clerk
>
Agenda Packets
>
2010-2019
>
2014
>
AgdaPkt 2014-03-24 Closed and Regular
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/8/2015 4:19:04 PM
Creation date
3/20/2014 6:17:49 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CC Index
CC Index - Document Type
Agenda Packet
Meeting Type
Regular
Agency Type
City Council
Date
3/24/2014
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
557
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
B.A. - Page 264 Pete's Harbor <br /> airy or rceawooa i,i y Revised EIR Addendum <br /> January 22, 2014 Page 3-23 <br /> Regarding item 1 above, no solar collectors exist on the Pete's Harbor site, nor are any <br /> proposed for the project. To further evaluate the project's compliance with General Plan <br /> Program BE-13, Figures 3.2-1 through 3.2-12 (earlier in this section) depict the proposed <br /> project's and nearby existing buildings' shadow patterns throughout the year. Separate from the <br /> shadow patterns themselves, the varying degrees of grayness of the landscape on the figures <br /> simulate the intensity of sunlight during the identified times of the year. For example, the grayer <br /> landscape for winter days simulates the lower angle of the sun and less direct sunlight <br /> compared to summer days. <br /> As illustrated by the figures, project shadows would not intrude on the neighboring Villas at Bair <br /> Island, on the Bair Island Wildlife Refuge, or on other nearby development or shadow-sensitive <br /> public open spaces. Also, shadows would not intrude substantially over an extended period of <br /> time on the adjacent water areas of Smith Slough or Redwood Creek, or on the proposed <br /> project's on-site public open space. It should also be noted that a combination of sun and <br /> shade is usually a goal when designing outdoor spaces. <br /> Conclusion. Mitigation 5-5 is no longer needed to address shadow impacts. As proposed, the <br /> current project would result in a less-than-significant shadow impact. <br /> Impact 5-6 Analysis: Project Consistency with City Urban Design Objectives. Based <br /> upon independent analysis by a qualified urban design professional,' the 2003 EIR identified <br /> design aspects of the 2003 EIR project (e.g., building/public space relationships) that were <br /> inconsistent with the City's existing Urban Design Guidelines and therefore represented a <br /> significant visual impact. The associated 2003 EIR mitigation included a series of design <br /> improvements to be formulated by the applicant in consultation with the City, such as varying <br /> the project's interior grid, rearranging building tower locations, visually enhancing the parking <br /> structures, and refining the design of proposed public spaces. <br /> Similar to the 2003 EIR project, the current project plans indicate a range of public and private <br /> open spaces, including approximately 1,258 linear feet of public access adjacent to Smith <br /> Slough and Redwood Creek (see Figures 2.5 through 2.13). Based on review of the current <br /> project preliminary plans in reference to landscaping, variety of building mass, and opportunities <br /> for both formal and informal open space, City staff has concluded that the proposed preliminary <br /> Pete's Harbor project design is potentially consistent with the City's "Nice Places" policy <br /> (adopted September 10, 2001), which states, "It is the policy of the City of Redwood City that in <br /> the design of public and private projects, high priority be given to creating comfortable, <br /> enjoyable, and aesthetically pleasing public spaces," and other applicable City urban design <br /> objectives. <br /> Architectural treatments and materials for the current project are assumed to be similar to those <br /> proposed for the 2003 EIR project, and, like the 2003 EIR project, would be generally <br /> compatible with adjacent residential development and consistent with higher quality residential <br /> development elsewhere in Redwood City. <br /> These preliminary findings regarding current project consistency with City urban design <br /> objectives would warrant continued verification during the City-required design review process <br /> as project architectural and landscape design details are refined and finalized. Until this design <br /> 1Bottomley Associates Urban Design & City Planning. <br /> T.110695 Pete's Harbor EIR Addendumlrevised addendum no 213(10695-01).doc <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.