My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Browse
Search
CC Min 1997-04-07
RedwoodCity
>
City Clerk
>
Minutes
>
1990-1999
>
1997
>
CC Min 1997-04-07
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/5/2005 2:44:18 PM
Creation date
4/6/2004 9:04:29 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CC Index
CC Index - Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Type
Regular
Agency Type
City Council
Date
4/7/1997
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
26
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br /> . - - <br /> District. There are still a number of lights remaining within the whole downtown area that <br /> this action will not affect, either positive or negative." <br /> --- In response to Councilman Leipzig's questions, Manager Patterson said if the City went <br /> with low pressure sodium and Plan A in the Underground District, the state would not <br /> require the City to institute Plan B. Councilman Leipzig said "if we go with Plan A and <br /> high pressure, according to State standards, we should go with plan B, eventually." <br /> Manager Patterson said, "That is not correct. Plan A was designed to include high <br /> pressure sodium so it does have additional lights so we do meet the safety factor in <br /> accordance with State guidelines. Plan B which would replace all the other lights outside <br /> of the Underground District. In that case, if we just start replacing the existing lights in <br /> some locations, we will not meet the state standards." <br /> Councilman Leipzig said, "So it is a decision do we want to stick with low pressure or go <br /> with high pressure. If we go with high pressure we should go to those outlying areas and <br /> get them up to state standards which is Plan B. <br /> City Manager Everett said, "But you are not making that decision at this time." <br /> Councilman Leipzig said, "I understand, but that would be a consistent policy, and that <br /> would raise the cost to nearly half a million dollars." <br /> City Manager Everett and Manager Patterson said, "That is correct." <br /> --- Councilman Leipzig said, "I would argue that since there is a motion on the floor, that we <br /> vote against the motion. I think we have to make a decision. We need more information <br /> whether we want low pressure or high pressure. Let's not go willy nilly and put some here <br /> and some there. We have to be consistent. Let's take a look at it. If we decide we need <br /> high pressure and we are going to change the entire downtown or the entire City, that's <br /> fme. Let's have that debate. But let's not do it piecemeal, because there is some debate as <br /> to Broadway, for example. Most people think that's low pressure, and it is not." <br /> City Manager Everett said, "I hope that with Broadway, we might try other things, like <br /> lamping and lighting and wattage and shielding, and do some experiments. That will take <br /> us awhile. 1 think there may be some other solutions to Broadway and some of those <br /> streets." <br /> In response to Council questions, Manager Patterson said it was difficult to be precise in <br /> predicting energy costs as each light is different. City Manager Everett said, "In the <br /> Underground District of l56lights, your annual cost will go up basically $2,500." <br /> Mayor Hartnett said, "SA-7 (Page number of the staff Report) is specific to the <br /> Underground Utility District, and the current yearly cost for the low pressure sodium at <br /> $8,566, and changing over to the high pressure would be $11,092." <br /> ---~ <br /> REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING MINUTE BOOK NO. 55 APRIL 7, 1997 <br /> MINUTES Page No. 239 PAGE 17 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.