Laserfiche WebLink
<br /> Dr. Steven Howard, member of the Architectural Advisory Commission, said it was a major <br /> step forward that the principals involved in this master plan were willing to sit down together <br /> and propose a plan that would so benefit the community. He commended the Planning <br /> Commission and the Council for making this a group effort. Dr. Howard expressed concern <br /> about the "massing effect", the automobile orientation rather than people orientation, and the <br /> lack of interior space. <br /> John Dempsey, Housing and Human Concems Committee, said he wanted to reinforce the <br /> plea for affordable housing. <br /> In response to Planning Commission questions regarding business relocation, Redevelopment <br /> Agency Director Church briefly described the extensive packages, and the policies under the <br /> law, required of Redevelopment Agencies in such cases. <br /> In response to Planning Commission questions regarding affordable housing units, <br /> Redevelopment Agency Director Church said that final policy decisions about affordable <br /> housing would be made by the Council acting in its role as the Redevelopment Agency. He <br /> said that generally speaking, neither the City nor the developers would want affordable units to <br /> be distinguishable from all other units. <br /> Don Warren provided background on the affordable housing component in the master plan in <br /> Redwood Shores and cited the several programs debated. He described Heron Court, and said <br /> that perhaps there was too much differentiation. Mr. Warren said there were many, many ways <br /> to deal with the subject of affordable housing, such as buy downs, second mortgage <br /> arrangements, and use of adjacent properties. He said this development team was interested in <br /> affordable housing and had already begun that dialogue with City staff. <br /> Redevelopment Agency Director Church said that if the Agency does enter into an <br /> agreement with a developer for this project, "there is an obligation under Redevelopment law to <br /> have at least 15% of the units in the project affordable to low and moderate income people." <br /> He said the Housing and Human Concerns Committee had expressed interest in a larger <br /> percentage of very low income affordable housing in this development, as that group was the <br /> core problem in this market area. <br /> In response to Planning Commission questions regarding acquisitions, Mr. Hansen said there <br /> were approximately 18 parcels exclusive of Lonestar, Pac Bell and Bekins. Redevelopment <br /> Agency Director Church said the concept plan presented at this meeting showed all 18 parcels <br /> included in the master plan, but did not address the issue of whether all could be acquired or <br /> not. He said the proposed development was a "blue sky concept" and there was a long way to <br /> go before "we know whether the economics make any sense.... It is better to think big, and <br /> then you may have to pare back from that." <br /> PLANNING COMMISSION STUDY SESSION WITH COUNCIL PARTICIPATION OCTOBER21,1997 <br /> STUDY SESSION MEETING MINUTES MINUTE BOOK NO. 55 PAGE 4 <br /> Page No. 606 <br />