Laserfiche WebLink
10.A - Page 14 <br /> • Blomquist Extension <br /> o Supports extension; badly needed for better access to Inner Harbor; traffic <br /> flow, and safety/emergency response <br /> o Include adequate bike lanes <br /> o Consider soundwall in relationship to type of development behind the Police <br /> station <br /> o More information is needed on improvements to Maple Street overpass <br /> (which is badly needed) in order to determine impacts on Blomquist <br /> SLC Representative <br /> • Supports Scenario A <br /> • Floating community is inconsistent with the Trust and does not benefit the public <br /> • Supports scenarios and implementation approaches that improve public access to <br /> Trust lands (e.g. cited the BIAC presentation of a floating dock for public access <br /> along the slough as consistent with this intention) <br /> IV. Task Force Confirmation of Plan Scenario <br /> After the Task Force provided their comments, the agenda then moved into the confirmation <br /> of the plan scenario agenda item. Ms. Brownfield explained the six levels of agreement that <br /> Task Force Members would use to cast their vote for the confirmation of the plan scenario. <br /> Those levels of agreement are: <br /> 1) Unqualified "yes" to the decision. <br /> 2) Decision is perfectly acceptable. Best of real options that are available to Task <br /> Force. <br /> 3) Can live with the decision; not especially enthusiastic about it. <br /> 4) Do not agree with the decision but willing to support because trust the group's <br /> wisdom. <br /> 5) No clear sense of unity in group. Need to do more work before mutual agreement <br /> can be reached. <br /> 6) Do not agree with the decision. Need to register my disagreement. <br /> The results of the roll call vote on Scenario A were as follows: <br /> Brown- 6; Does not like Scenario A as Walnut connection would bifurcate the County <br /> property <br /> Buckmaster- Yes, per written statement <br /> Mann- Yes, per written statement <br /> Hippard- 6; Does not like auto dependency; would prefer more open space <br /> Birdwell- Comment: No Walnut; too much fragmenting <br /> Greenway- Comment: Likes roadways in Scenario B <br /> Jensen- Comment: uncertainty; prefers Scenario B road configuration <br /> The results of this first vote indicated that neither scenario A or B, as is, would meet a threshold <br /> of approval per the group consensus method. The Task Force then voted on requirements to <br /> include in/amend the scenarios. The requirements and levels of agreement are listed below. <br /> Inner Harbor Task Force l April 16, 2014 Meeting Summary <br />