My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Browse
Search
1966 339-342 _ 11-7 cont.
RedwoodCity
>
City Clerk
>
Minutes
>
1966
>
1966 339-342 _ 11-7 cont.
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2017 11:36:32 AM
Creation date
12/16/2016 12:27:13 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CC Index
CC Index - Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Type
Regular
Agency Type
City Council
Date
8/8/1966
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
4
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
339 <br />Councilman Rosselli moved to introduce Ordinance appropriating the sum of $9,000 <br />from Unappropriated Balance of Sewer Rental Fund for purpose of supplementing funds <br />heretofore appropriated for sanitary sewer maintenance, seconded by Councilman <br />Keckley and carried. <br />Consideration of applications for CATV licenses received from the following: <br />1. Hi Fidelity T. V. Cable System Co. <br />2. Peninsula Cable Television Corporation <br />Paul F. Kelly, attorney representing Hi Fidelity Cable <br />System Company, set forth details submitted in their <br />application as to their financial abaility and backing. <br />He stated franchise had been granted to this company by County <br />Board of Supervisors for areas outside and adjacent to City <br />and they would be immediately able to cover areas proposed in <br />their map, and asked their application be considered as <br />presented if decision to be made at this time. <br />Mayor Herkner questioned service being proposed for County and if it was to be <br />underground installation. Mr. Kelly advised underground servicing would be furnished <br />where utilities are underground, but where lines were above ground, these poles <br />would be used, as it would be economically not possible to do otherwise. <br />Councilman Rosselli further questioned costs of providing underground service and <br />costs to customers. Councilman Petersen felt it premature to consider making a <br />decision at this point and asked that Hi Fidelity T. V. Cable System Company be <br />allowed to present their brochure in form similar to that presented by other appli- <br />cant in order a more accurate comparison could be made. <br />Mr. Kelly agreed with Mr. Petersen's statements and assured <br />Council a brochure would be presented containing full facts <br />of their Company. <br />Council asked questions concerning type of service to be rendered, its value to <br />better reception by television users, and costs of service to customers. <br />Mr. Verne Laughton, representing Peninsula Cable Television <br />Corp. referred to their brochure describing their service <br />costs, area to be served and financial responsibility. Mr. <br />Laughton also described the public information channel which <br />would be of benefit to the City and described its possibilities <br />as to use. <br />After further discussion and questions concerning services proposed, Councilman <br />Petersen moved to table the applications until brochure received from Hi Fidelity <br />and report and investigation made by Staff, seconded by Councilman Keckley and <br />carried. (MINUTE ORDER #66-226) <br />Councilman Bury asked report from Staff indicate how this service would relate to <br />civil defense aspects, market potential, amount of units possible for installation, <br />etc. Councilman Henderson suggested Council members submit to the City Manager a <br />list of questions to which they desire answered, for transmittal to the applicants <br />----------------- ------------ -�--------------------- <br />-------------- <br />Amendment to the Minutes of November 7, 1966 (Councilman Bury)' =1 <br />Page -6- re Applications for CATV licenses. — <br />"Peninsula Cable Television Corporation agreed, on question t <br />by Councilman Bury, that if the Ordinance prohibited anything ient <br />except undergrounding, they would still be interested in going <br />forward with their project." in- <br />cilman Granger, if maker would consent to add to motion that, if County doesn't <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.