PRC MIN 1974-02-13 - Laserfiche WebLink

Browse Search

-=-"~ ~~ - 5 MINUTES REDWOOD CITY PARKS & RECREATION CCMaS SI ON FEBRUARY 13, 1974 The regular business meeting was called to order by Chairman tarry Schenck at 7:37 PM in the Lobby meeting, room. of the Community Activities Building. ROLL CALL Commissioners Present: Guida (arrived 7:45 1M, Knecht,. Pound, Rollins, Schenck and Weintraub Commissioners Absent: Haynes staff Prèsent: Director Weeks, SUperintendent Paulson, Stlperintendent Balzarini, S~MS~ ~tz (~ft 9:30), aM Secrèt~'~llic~o Audience: Foreman Griffiths, Building Director Gyselbrecht, Att,orney Schricker, GAP students Jcr¡ Barr, R Barbara Moon, Erica stein, Susan Twietmeyer, Mark. Green, Felice Stein, I,g;urel wan, Kitty Chiu, George Granoff, Martin- Chajes, Carol Szäsu; - other audience included Aurora Roselli, Bob Pierce__and Allan Weintraub Chairman Schenck requested Miss Twietmeyer to introduce the GAP students. ~ti~n: Commissioner Rollins moved that the Jinutes of the January 9, 1974 Regular Business Meeting be approved as mailed; seconded by Commissioner Pound. The motion carried unanimously by voice vote. The San Mateo County~ Workshop was mentioned. Commissioners Weintraub, Pound, Guida, - and Roll~ were interested in attending. Staff advised Commission they would check on the possibility. of sending three or four Commissio~ers to the Workshop . ~ . . AGENDA ITEM 1 - Presentation - Historical Preservation ~ I - 11!1..- r ... U L L- . W -_.-...dII ------.¡g - . Mr. Gyselbrecht, Director of the Building Department, was introduced. He related that he and Messrs. Pasich, Weeks, Vollmayer and Schroeter made up the staff Historical Preservations Committee and have been working on same architectural form of historical preservation to which the City ,:might respond. He ga-œ a slide presentation which covered various architectural building designs in Redwood City. The Canmittee had also contacted an architect in San Francisco, Ted Molton, who has made a proposal to provide a first stage study regarding the direction Redwood City might take. However,_.this ..proposal WaJJ not being pursued at the present¿ time because the Committee first wanted to propose its ideas to more Boards and Commissions for their related input. ~ Discussion was held and Commissioners offered their comments and suggestions, along with the G.A.P. (Government Activities Program) students. Mr. Gyselbrecht indicated the Committee would get the study in some final format along with Mr. Molton's ~proposal and would at that time bring it before the Commission again. Chairman Schenck thanked Mr. GyselbreCht for coming and giiing his informative and interesting presentation.