My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Browse
Search
MO 97-161
RedwoodCity
>
City Clerk
>
Minute Orders
>
1990-1999 partial
>
1997
>
MO 97-161
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/5/2005 2:35:47 PM
Creation date
1/6/2003 10:35:07 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CC Index
CC Index - Document Type
Minute Order
Agency Type
City Council
Date
7/28/1997
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
2
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
MINUTE ORDER <br /> CITY COUNCIL MEETING <br /> <br /> July 28, 1997 <br /> MO. 97-161 <br /> <br />CITY CLERK DEPARTMENT <br />Redwood City <br /> <br />DATE: July 30, 1997 <br /> <br />Attention: City Manager <br /> City Attorney <br /> Council <br /> Fire Chief <br /> <br /> SUBJECT: Execution of Agreement Between County of San Marco And City of <br /> Redwood City, Service Area No. 8. (304) <br /> <br />Meeting of the Council of the City of Redwood City on July 28, 1997. <br /> <br />Present: Councilmembers Buchan, Howard, La Berge, Leipzig <br /> and Mayor Hartnett <br /> <br />Absent: Claire and Ruskin <br /> <br />The following motion was made, carded and entered on the Minutes: <br /> <br /> Mayor Itartnett said, "I asked that we pull this, and Council, what I suggest we <br /> do for this tonight, we re-calendar this for our next meeting which would be our <br /> first meeting in August, for a number of reasons. The contract has only recently <br /> become available for evaluation. I think there are a couple of issues that need to <br /> be explored a bit further in the contract, before the Council is in the position to <br /> vote on it. It is my understanding that, such contract that we may approve with <br /> the County is retroactive to July 1, so that, should we not take action tonight, <br /> and take action at our first meeting in August, and the retroactive term in it <br /> remains, I would expect that the services that have been provided since July 1 <br /> would be provided in accordance with the contract. So I don't think it puts us in <br /> an untenable, legal position. I personally would simply prefer to have some <br /> work done on this a little more, before we find ourselves in a position to vote on <br /> it. Unless any of you would prefer to do otherwise, I would prefer to put it off <br /> to August." <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.