My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Browse
Search
AgdaPkt 2014-07-28 Closed, Special and Joint SA
RedwoodCity
>
City Clerk
>
Agenda Packets
>
2010-2019
>
2014
>
AgdaPkt 2014-07-28 Closed, Special and Joint SA
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/30/2014 9:34:48 AM
Creation date
7/24/2014 3:03:33 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CC Index
CC Index - Document Type
Agenda Packet
Meeting Type
Joint
Agency Type
City Council and Successor Agency
Date
7/28/2014
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
409
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
8.B. - Page 94 <br /> 2. Consolidated Outdoor Activities Alternative: The scenario evaluated under the <br /> Consolidated Outdoor Activities Alternative (Draft EIR: Summary section on p. 3- <br /> 4 and Section 7.3 on p. 93 -96 ) reduces the total amount of time during the <br /> school day that outdoor activities would occur, from 5.5 hours /day under the <br /> proposed Project, to 4.25 hours /day under this alternative, by reducing the <br /> overall regular school day recess time by 15 minutes, consolidating the separate <br /> 1 and 2 and the 3 through 5 grade morning recess times into one <br /> consolidated recess time for the 1 through 5 grades, and eliminating one of the <br /> two daily 30- minute after school recess periods (Draft EIR: p. 95, Table 7.3 -1). <br /> Under this alternative, noise levels would be incrementally higher during the <br /> morning recess period compared to the proposed Project, but the overall daily <br /> average noise level would decrease because the daily student outdoor activities <br /> would be reduced by 1.25 hours compared to the proposed Project. Because <br /> this alternative involves the reduction of outdoor play time for the children that is <br /> further reduced than what the Project proposes (which already proposes a <br /> reduced outdoor play time of 90 minutes compared to the California Department <br /> of Education recommendation of 100 minutes of physical education per week per <br /> student), staff recommends that the Planning Commission reject this alternative <br /> as infeasible. <br /> 3. Courtyard Play Area Alternative: The scenario evaluated under the Courtyard <br /> Play Area Alternative (Summary section on p. 5 and Section 7.4 on p. 96 -98 of <br /> the Draft EIR) identifies using the church's interior courtyard between the church <br /> sanctuary and the Fellowship Hall as a fourth outdoor play area, and constructing <br /> a 7 -foot high noise barrier along the northernmost perimeter of the courtyard or <br /> residential property line. Under this scenario, outdoor activities would occur in <br /> the three play areas identified under the proposed Project in addition to the <br /> interior courtyard area. Surrounding residences would be exposed to lower <br /> hourly noise levels during outdoor activities under this alternative compared to <br /> the proposed Project. However, under this alternative, the daily average noise <br /> levels would be similar to the proposed Project at 61 dBA CNEL, exceeding the <br /> City's 55 dBA CNEL compatibility threshold established for residential land uses <br /> by 6 dBA CNEL and substantially increased above existing conditions of 49 dBA <br /> CNEL. Staff recommends that the Planning Commission reject this alternative as <br /> infeasible because the Courtyard Area serves as the church's primary entrance <br /> and gateway to the property and would require substantial structural <br /> modifications to the existing courtyard, including the removal or relocation of a <br /> large boulder outcrop, which extends deep into the substrate and into the church <br /> itself, in order to construct a level play area. <br /> 4. Environmentally Superior Alternative: The scenario evaluated under the <br /> Environmentally Superior Alternative (Summary section on p. 5 -6 and Section 7.5 <br /> on p. 99 of the Draft EIR) combines both the Consolidated Outdoor Activities <br /> Alternative and the Courtyard Play Area Alternative by consolidating the outdoor <br /> activities, as identified in the Consolidated Outdoor Activities Alternative, while <br /> utilizing the Courtyard Play Area as a fourth outdoor play area. For the reasons <br /> stated for each of these alternatives, separately or combined, staff recommends <br /> that the Planning Commission reject this alternative as infeasible. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.