My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Browse
Search
PRC MIN 1978-11-08
RedwoodCity
>
Park and Rec Commission
>
Parks & Rec Comm Minutes
>
1970-1978
>
1978
>
PRC MIN 1978-11-08
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/4/2014 8:23:16 AM
Creation date
12/4/2014 8:23:15 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Park and Rec Comm
Park and Rec Comm - Document Type
Minutes
Date
11/8/1978
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
15
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
t 4 <br /> � /'� <br /> � � <br /> T0: Parks & Recreation Commission <br /> FROM: Community & Commission Relations Committee <br /> DATE: November 29, 1978 <br /> SUBJECT: STATUS REPORT - JOINT PARK & RECREATION COMMISSION A�JD CIVIC <br /> CULTURAL COMMISSION C0�'IMITTEE <br /> The joint committee of the Parks & Recreation Commission and the Civic <br /> Cultural Commission met November 29, 1978. Those Commissioners present <br /> were Commissioners Knecht, Hayes and Weintraub (Weintraub was sitting <br /> in for Schlesinger) and Commissioners Mears, Kennedy and Swope. <br /> The joint committee �net to initiate their discussions relevant to the <br /> possibility of combining the Parks & Recreation Commission and the Civic <br /> Cultural Commission into one body. The staff reviewed the backgrounds <br /> of both comnissions ,�nd pointed out the various responsibilities which <br /> the City Council had vested in both comnissions. There was some dis- <br /> cussion relative to �the origin of the commissions and the various dif- <br /> ferences in operatioiaal responsibilities of each. It was the consensus <br /> of the Committee tha�t they should attemot to thoroughly review the obli- <br /> gations which both Commissions have to the community and attempt to <br /> arrive at their best recommendation with respect to how these responsi- <br /> bilities can best be met. <br /> Some pros and cons were discussed which helped to delineate the advan- <br /> tages and disadvantages which would be more thoroughly reviewed in <br /> future meetings. The Corr�nittee decided to invite representatives <br /> from two or three other cities that are currently operating on a com- <br /> bined basis in order to receive first hand information from this type <br /> of operation. It was agreed that several meetings would be held in <br /> order that the subject might be thoroughly reviewed and that the next <br /> meeting would be after the first of the year. The staff will arrange <br /> for the representatives from the other cities to be present at this <br /> meetinq or at successive meetings, which ever is mutually convenient. <br /> The Committee representatives from both commissions urged the comnis- <br /> sions to submit as much input as possible to the joint committee so <br /> that all considerations will be discussed. <br /> -7- <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.