Laserfiche WebLink
rather than the five-year program . <br /> A lengthy discussion ensued with respect to the setting of priorities , the <br /> rationale used by the committee to establish priorities , problems involved in <br /> adding new areas which will require additional park maintenance and the need <br /> to prioritize individual projects within parks . <br /> MOTION : Commissioner Rollins moved , seconded by Commissioner <br /> Schlesinger , to approve the Budget Committee Report . <br /> The motion carried unanimously by voice vote . <br /> MOTION : Commissioner Wilson moved , seconded by Commissioner <br /> Schlesinger , that at the time of the budget session <br /> if a recommendation is necessary with respect to <br /> priority of projects , that Canyon Park be the Number 1 <br /> Priority . The motion passed on the following vote : <br /> Yes - Commissioners Aldrich , Knecht , Pound , Schlesinger , <br /> Weintraub and Wilson <br /> No - Commissioner Rollins <br /> Additional discussion followed with respect to which project should have the <br /> Number 2 Priority . The discussion resulted in the following motion . <br /> MOTION : Commissioner Aldrich moved and it was seconded by <br /> Commissioner Pound to make Palm Park , Priority Number 2 . <br /> The motion failed by the following vote : <br /> No - Commissioners Knecht , Rollins , Schlesinger and <br /> Wilson <br /> Yes - Commissioners Aldrich , Pound and Weintraub <br /> MOTION : Commissioner Rollins moved , seconded by Commissioner <br /> Wilson , to make Red Morton Community Park Priority <br /> Number 2 . <br /> Discussion ensued on the motion as to the relative merits of various projects <br /> within Palm and Red Morton Parks . Following the discussion Commissioner Rollins <br /> withdrew his motion . Commissioner Wilson withdrew his second . <br /> MOTION : Commissioner Aldrich moved , seconded by Commissioner <br /> Rollins , to return Capital Improvement projects for <br /> Red Morton and Palm Parks to the Budget Committee for <br /> priority setting . The motion carried unanimously by <br /> voice vote . <br /> In that it was necessary to have the Capital Program submitted before the next <br /> regular commission meeting , discussion ensued as to whether the matter of park <br /> priorities could be taken up in an adjourned , special meeting of the Commission . <br /> - 5 - <br />