My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Browse
Search
PRC MIN 1976-08-11
RedwoodCity
>
Park and Rec Commission
>
Parks & Rec Comm Minutes
>
1970-1978
>
1976
>
PRC MIN 1976-08-11
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/4/2014 11:10:44 AM
Creation date
12/4/2014 11:10:43 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Park and Rec Comm
Park and Rec Comm - Document Type
Minutes
Date
8/11/1976
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
14
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
. �,r `vrr� <br /> not wish to change its ;meeting location as it had been meeting at the <br /> Coi►nnunity Activities Building for several years. He referred to the <br /> Stamp Show which had been conducted by the Club and co-sponsored by the <br /> Parks & Recreation Department. He indicated that the weekend show had <br /> been free to the public and had drawn an attendance of 500 to 600 per- <br /> sons. He believed that this activity had created goodwill 'for both the <br /> Club and the City of Redwood City. He mentioned that the Club was plan- <br /> ning to conduct this show again in 1976. <br /> Commissioner Rollins inquired as to the Club's current percent of resi- <br /> dents. Mr. Rosen replied that the current percentage was in the neigh- <br /> borhood of 20-25�. Comnissioner Rollins reminded Mr. Rosen that public <br /> facilities are in great demand in Redwood City and that Redwobd City <br /> residents by virtue of the fact that they bear the financial burden of <br /> building and maintaining such facilities must have priority of use. He <br /> further inquired as to whether or not the Stamp Club met all other <br /> requirements of the co-sponsorship policy. Ms. Will indicated that the <br /> other requirements posed no problem. <br /> For background pur.poses Mr. Weeks reviewed the Comnission's intent at <br /> reviewing and revising the co-sponsorship policy. He indicated that <br /> essentially the problem was one of availability of limited facilities <br /> for Redwood City residents and that the Commission recognized that there <br /> would be some groups who would have more difficulty than others in meet- <br /> ing some of the new requirements. Accordingly, the Comnission was allow- <br /> ing as much time as possible for current groups to comply with the require- <br /> ments. Mr. Weeks inquired as to whether or not the Stamp Club felt a <br /> recruitment drive would be successful in raising the percentage of resi- <br /> dents to 70� by January 1 , 1977. Mr. Rosen responded that a recruitment <br /> campaign aimed specificall,y at Redwood City residents was currently under- <br /> way. He doubted, however, that even a successful campaign would raise <br /> percentage of residents beyond the 45-50� level . <br /> Discussion ensued and Mr. Rosen responded to Commissioners' questions <br /> regarding the opening of inembership to youth, the status of associate <br /> membership, the benefits derived from membership dues, the amount of <br /> yearly membership turnover, the possibility of fund raising affairs to <br /> pay the rental fees should the Club not qualify for co-sponsorship status, <br /> the possibility of charging a nominal fee at the annual Stamp Show, the <br /> number and residency status of inembers attending monthly meetings, and <br /> the success of previous membership drives. <br /> Discussion continued regarding the question of youth membership. Mr. Rosen <br /> indicated that there was a youth group affiliated with the Sequoia Stamp <br /> Club, that it meets regularly in the City of San Carlos, �hat the young- <br /> sters were not considered a part of the club membership and that the group <br /> consisted of only 15 to 20 persons and would not have a significant effect <br /> on changing the residency status. <br /> Commissioner Buckhout comnented that he had participated in numerous Parks <br /> & Recreation activities and that even though he was a longtime resident as <br /> an adult, he had to pay the cost of whatever activities in which he parti- <br /> cipated. He further stated that non-residents had to pay an additional <br /> - 2 - <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.